Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Ramirez, 616 P.2d 924.

257 citing documents.

State v. Romero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Because Romero failed to raise these arguments in the superior court, (appellate court does not address argument raised for the first time in a petition for review); see also Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Cassise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Cassise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(clarifying this Court will not review issues raised for the first time in a motion for rehearing); (same); Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Keith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Keith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
P. 32.9(c)(1)(ii); State v. Wagstaff, 2 STATE v. KEITH Decision of the Court
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Candelaria Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Candelaria Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Vidal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Vidal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Salerno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Salerno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Chayrez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Roberson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Chayrez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
approved as modified, Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Roberson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
approved as modified, Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Ortloff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Ortloff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“Rule 32.6(d) requires that amendments to pleadings be made prior to the trial court’s ruling dismissing the petition or prior to the trial court’s order granting or denying relief on the merits after a hearing on the petition pursuant to Rule 32.8(d).”).
State v. Ellis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Ellis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(stating appellate court does not consider issues in petition for review that “have obviously never been presented to the trial court for its consideration”); Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Couch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Couch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Arias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cecena-Cota Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cecena-Cota Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Arias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-68, -28 (App. 1980); -78, -39 (App. 1991); Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Benally Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Benally Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Carpenter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Carpenter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Deshaw Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Deshaw Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
P. 32.9(c)(1)(ii); (App. 3 STATE v. BARTELS Decision of the Court 1980)
State v. Mercado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Mercado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Jessup Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Jessup Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Spurling Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Spurling Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Turner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015