Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Morgan, 625 P.2d 951.

42 citing documents.

State v. Gutierrez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Gutierrez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 42 (2005); ¶ 7 (App. 1998)
State v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(holding that a defendant 3 Count 3 alleged that Defendant “knowing or having reason to know that .
State of Arizona v. Travis Hamilton Nereim 317 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Travis Hamilton Nereim 317 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
§ 13-1201 if he places victim in “actual substantial risk”), (emphasis in Doss).
State of Arizona v. Jose Dejesus Villegas-Rojas 296 P.3d 981 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. Jose Dejesus Villegas-Rojas 296 P.3d 981 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State v. Morgan, 128 Ariz. 362
State v. Carreon 107 P.3d 900 Ariz. 2005
State v. Carreon 107 P.3d 900 Ariz. 2005
The court of appeals has held that a defendant places a person in “substantial risk” if he places the victim “in actual substantial risk of imminent death.” , 411 ¶ 10, (emphasis added)
State of Arizona v. Carl W. Morgan, Jr 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Morgan 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Morgan 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State of Arizona v. Carl W. Morgan, Jr 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
In Re Ryan A. 39 P.3d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
In Re Ryan A. 39 P.3d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
§ 13-1202 before its amendment in 1994, , which interprets the pre-1994 version of the statute.
In Re Kyle M. 27 P.3d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
In Re Kyle M. 27 P.3d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
(holding the crime of attempted threatening *450 or intimidating requires proving defendant intended to place victim in state of terror in anticipation of the threatened harm).
State v. Flynt 13 P.3d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. Flynt 13 P.3d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
§ 13-1201, states that “[a] person commits endangerment by recklessly endangering another person with a substantial risk of imminent death or physical injury.” , this court limited the statute’s application to conduct that places the victim in “actual substantial risk” of death or physical injury.
State v. Doss 966 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Doss 966 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Mendoza 823 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1992
State v. Mendoza 823 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1992
State v. Valdez 770 P.2d 313 Ariz. 1989
State v. Valdez 770 P.2d 313 Ariz. 1989
vacated on other grounds, In re Pima County Juvenile Action No. 5-78539-2, , , (focus under A.R.S.
State v. Torres 750 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Torres 750 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-78539-2 693 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1984
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-78539-2 693 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1984
written by Division One, in that portion applying to our basic issue here, addressed the question of what lesser included offenses should be a part of the court’s instructions to the jury.
State v. Noriega 690 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1984
State v. Noriega 690 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1984
In re the Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. J-78539-2 693 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
In re the Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. J-78539-2 693 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
the juvenile court rejected this argument, apparently concluding that it was sufficient for conviction if the state proved that appellant intentionally fired the gun and that the deputy was thereby put in reasonable apprehension of imminent physical injury.
State v. Emery 688 P.2d 175 Ariz. 1984
State v. Emery 688 P.2d 175 Ariz. 1984
741 , 62 L.Ed.2d 736 (1980) (fact that no one could positively identify jewelry as part of the jewelry store’s pre-robbery inventory goes to the weight given to the evidence, not its admissibility)
State v. May 669 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. May 669 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
2 , , have held that threatening and intimidating is not a lesser included offense of aggravated assault.
State v. Rineer 639 P.2d 337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Rineer 639 P.2d 337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Verive 627 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
State v. Verive 627 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981