Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Sodders, 633 P.2d 432.

45 citing documents.

State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Bluhm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Bluhm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Yug 501 P.3d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Yug 501 P.3d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Cuen, 158 Ariz. at 87-88; (concluding that the legislature did not intend to give “compounded credit time when consecutive sentences are imposed”).
State v. Osborne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Osborne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(stating the factual basis need not show guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; only strong evidence of guilt need be established); (stating the factual basis to support a plea may be ascertained from the extended record).
State v. Irvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Irvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
(strong evidence of guilt required); (factual basis may be established by the extended record).
State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lechuga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Lechuga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Gary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Gary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Pittman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Pittman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-30 (App. 1981) (relating that credit should not be given on each consecutive sentence).
State v. Andrada-Pastrano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Andrada-Pastrano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(holding court may consider the extended record, including presentence report, in determining whether sufficient factual basis exists for guilty plea).
State v. Clayton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Clayton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Salinas 880 P.2d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Stevenson 830 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Stevenson 830 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
this court stated: The factual basis may be determined from the extended record which may include presentence report, preliminary hearing transcripts, statements of the defendant, proceedings before the grand jury, and other sources.
State v. Rodriguez 830 P.2d 867 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Rodriguez 830 P.2d 867 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Gaydas 766 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Gaydas 766 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Weaver 762 P.2d 1361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Weaver 762 P.2d 1361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Cuen 761 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Cuen 761 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. O'Connor 703 P.2d 563 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. O'Connor 703 P.2d 563 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
495 , 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971)
State v. Romero 702 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Romero 702 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
495 , 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971) , for the proposition that a breach of a plea agreement occurs either when the prosecution breaks its promise or when the spirit of the inducement is breached.
State v. Cruz-Mata 674 P.2d 1368 Ariz. 1983
Overruled State v. Cruz-Mata 674 P.2d 1368 Ariz. 1983
We note that State v. Warde, supra, (credit for presentence custody given on one of two consecutive sentences), , (credit for presentence custody should not be given on each consecutive sentence) remain sound law after today’s decision.
State v. Bloom 669 P.2d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Bloom 669 P.2d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
495 , 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971); , , (App.1981)