DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Lycett, 650 P.2d 487.

26 citing documents.

  • CENTER FOR AZ v. AZ SECRETARY OF STATE Ariz. 2026
    of the language in [the Speak Freely Clause] even remotely suggests an absolute privilege to damage the reputation of another person”); Truax v. Bisbee Local, No. 380, Cooks’ & Waiters’ Union, (discussing when the right to speak is “abused to the harm of another” and noting that remedies available include “an action for damages” and “a criminal action”); (concluding speech encouraging others to join pyramid scheme was not constitutionally protected; criminal liability may be imposed for “such in
  • State v. Boehler 262 P.3d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
  • State v. Boehler 262 P.3d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
  • State v. Slayton 154 P.3d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
  • State v. Slayton 154 P.3d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
    (providing the state has wide latitude to enact strict liability statutes that protect public health, safety, and welfare); Ariz. Mines Supply Co., 107 Ariz. at 207 , 484 P.2d at 627 (holding the legislature may make the doing of an act or the neglect to do something a crime without
  • State v. McDonald 952 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • State v. McDonald 952 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • AA MECHANICAL v. Superior Court 948 P.2d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
  • State v. McLamb 932 P.2d 266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. McLamb 932 P.2d 266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. Roscoe 912 P.2d 1297 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Roscoe 912 P.2d 1297 Ariz. 1996
    as proof that this court has a duty to construe legislation such as the Implementation Act so as to be constitutional.
  • Bird v. State 908 P.2d 12 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • Bird v. State 908 P.2d 12 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • State v. Crisp 855 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Crisp 855 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
    to make a course of conduct illegal merely because the conduct was in part initiated, evidenced, or carried out by means of lan-guage____” , quoting Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co., 336 U.S. 490, 502 , 69 S.Ct.
  • State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
    United States v. Chindawongse, 771 F.2d 840 , 845 n. 4 (4th Cir. 1985), cert.
  • State v. Padilla 817 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
  • State v. Padilla 817 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
    the legislature has broad discretion to define criminal offenses.
  • State v. Steiger 781 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
  • State v. Steiger 781 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
    Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Foundation
  • State v. Scotia 704 P.2d 289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Scotia 704 P.2d 289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Martin 679 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Martin 679 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1984