DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Just, 675 P.2d 1353.

71 citing documents.

  • State v. Ojeda 769 P.2d 1006 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Ojeda 769 P.2d 1006 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Ojeda 764 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
  • State v. Olsen 760 P.2d 603 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
  • State v. Olsen 760 P.2d 603 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
  • State v. Germain 723 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Germain 723 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
    Further, , , we extended Bly to second degree murder convictions, holding that the infliction of serious bodily injury or death can be used as an aggravating factor, even though it is a necessary element of the crime, because our legislature has specifically mandated that infliction of serious injury or
  • State v. Cantua-Ramirez 718 P.2d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
  • State v. Cantua-Ramirez 718 P.2d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
  • State v. Van Winkle 719 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
  • State v. Van Winkle 719 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
  • State v. Angle 720 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Angle 720 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Salazar 707 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • State v. Salazar 707 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • State v. Wiley 698 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Wiley 698 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1985
    As our Court of Appeals has stated: [T]he purpose of a grand jury proceeding is to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that the individual committed an offense, and that “[pjrior to trial the question of whether probable cause exists is an open one, however, after a full scale trial in which a jury determines guilt beyond a reasonable doubt the question is closed.”
  • State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
    Defendant contends that the court was using a mitigating factor as an aggravat *407 , (where the sentencing court incorrectly used the defendant’s prior exemplary life as an aggravating factor).
  • State v. Hutchinson 688 P.2d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
  • State v. Hutchinson 688 P.2d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
    Rule 804(a)(3), Rules of Evidence, 17A A.R.S.