Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Moreno, 655 P.2d 23.

82 citing documents.

State v. Day Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Day Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
§ 13-4033(B); (plea agreement waives all prior non-jurisdictional defenses, errors, and defects).
State v. Gunter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gunter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
disapproved of on other grounds by State ex rel.
State v. Denham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Denham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
rev'd on other grounds, State ex rel.
State v. Leacock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Leacock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
rev’d on other grounds State ex rel.
State v. Booker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Booker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Mayo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Mayo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
abrogated on other grounds, State ex rel.
State v. Ford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Ford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Soto 224 P.3d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State v. Soto 224 P.3d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
A defendant who enters a valid guilty plea waives the “right to assert on appeal all nonjurisdictional defenses, errors and defects occurring prior to the plea proceedings.” , disapproved on other grounds by State ex rel.
State v. Flores 188 P.3d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
State v. Flores 188 P.3d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
(entering a plea of guilty waived all of defendant’s non-jurisdictional defenses, *410 errors, and defects prior to the plea).
State Ex Rel. Dean v. Dolny 778 P.2d 1193 Ariz. 1989
State Ex Rel. Dean v. Dolny 778 P.2d 1193 Ariz. 1989
The city objected to the jury settings, , and State ex rel.
State v. Richey 762 P.2d 585 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Richey 762 P.2d 585 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. City Court of Tucson 760 P.2d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. City Court of Tucson 760 P.2d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Regarding moral turpitude, , : Without the benefit of in-depth research, the majority is not prepared to say that in today’s society the [offense of possession of marijuana] involves such an appreciable degree of moral turpitude (branding the defendant “a depraved and inherently base person”) beyond that present in convict
State v. Henderson 717 P.2d 933 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Henderson 717 P.2d 933 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Frey 686 P.2d 1291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Frey 686 P.2d 1291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
authorizes a trial judge to decide before trial whether the crime will be designated a felony or a misdemeanor upon conviction.
State Ex Rel. Dean v. City Court of Tucson 687 P.2d 369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State Ex Rel. Dean v. City Court of Tucson 687 P.2d 369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984