Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Thomas, 688 P.2d 1093.

42 citing documents.

Howie v. Howie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Howie v. Howie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Sec., () (“An abuse of discretion is characterized by arbitrariness or capriciousness and failure to conduct an adequate investigation into the relevant facts.”).
State v. Balli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Balli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Tejeda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Tejeda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Escalante, 245 Ariz. at 142, ¶ 21; (“An illegal sentence is no sentence at all.”).
State v. Coffelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Coffelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(resentencing once original sentence vacated was “sentencing anew” and, in absence of constitutional prohibitions, trial court was free to impose any sentence legally allowed).
State of Arizona v. Anthony Connue Serrano 323 P.3d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Anthony Connue Serrano 323 P.3d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr. 301 P.3d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr. 301 P.3d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
see Falkner, 112 Ariz. at 374 , 542 P.2d at 406 (holding trial court lacks inherent authority to modify sentence); see also Ariz. R.Crim.
State of Arizona v. Della Lisa Vermuele Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Della Lisa Vermuele Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Bryant 200 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Jerry Don Bryant Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Jerry Don Bryant Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
And neither in Suniga, P.2d 1197, P.2d 1093 (App. 1984), did the court even use the word “void.” Accordingly, none of these cases requires us to find that the trial court’s expungement order is void.
State v. Bryant 200 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
And neither in Suniga, , , , did the court even use the word “void.” Accordingly, none of these eases requires us to find that the trial court’s expungement order is void.
State of Arizona v. Armando D. Rodriguez-Gonzales Hieber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Rodriguez-Gonzales 92 P.3d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State of Arizona v. Armando D. Rodriguez-Gonzales Hieber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
201, 204, (after sentences vacated by appellate court and case remanded, trial court “was not modifying previously imposed sentences .
State v. Rodriguez-Gonzales 92 P.3d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
(after sentences vacated by appellate court and case remanded, trial court “was not modifying previously imposed sentences ...
State v. Doss 966 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Doss 966 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Carbajal 907 P.2d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
State v. Carbajal 907 P.2d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
State v. Calderon 827 P.2d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Calderon 827 P.2d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. House 821 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. House 821 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Glasscock 812 P.2d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Glasscock 812 P.2d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Nieuwenhuis v. Kelly 795 P.2d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Nieuwenhuis v. Kelly 795 P.2d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
A lawful or lawfully imposed sentence may not be altered after it is entered, see Rule 24.3, Ariz.R.Crim.P., 17 A.R.S., , whereas a trial court clearly has authority to modify probation, even outside the scope of a revocation proceeding.
Avila v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 772 P.2d 600 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Avila v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 772 P.2d 600 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Bouchier 767 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Bouchier 767 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Rutherford 744 P.2d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Rutherford 744 P.2d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
See Rule 24.3, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure
State v. Carvajal 709 P.2d 1366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Carvajal 709 P.2d 1366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985