Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Zamora, 681 P.2d 921.

25 citing documents.

State v. Valenzuela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Valenzuela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
“An essential element of self-defense is the accused’s freedom from fault in provoking the difficulty that gives rise to the use of the force.”
State v. Jaynes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Jaynes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Harrell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Harrell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶19 Character evidence is generally inadmissible “to prove that a person acted in conformity therewith,” but “an accused may offer proof of [a] victim’s reputation for violence when an issue of self-defense is raised.” (citing Ariz. R. Evid.
State v. Rivas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Rivas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Azar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Azar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
5 the State argues that gang membership does not correlate to a “reputation for violence” and therefore evidence of gang affiliation is not admissible under Rule 405(A).
State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Connor, 215 Ariz. at 559, ¶ 13 ().
State v. Crandall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Crandall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-41, -24 (App. 1984) (permitting defense in an aggravated assault case to introduce specific instances of the victim’s possession of a gun, of which the defendant was aware; evidence was relevant to the defendant’s state of mind at the time of the incident).
State v. Fish 213 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Fish 213 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
(specific acts of known prior violence by victim admissible to show defendant’s state of mind and that decedent was of a violent and turbulent disposition); -21 , -32 (1963) (specific acts of prior violence by victim admissible if known by defendant to show defendant’s state of mind); , (specific instances of prior violence known by defendant admissible to show state of mind).
State v. Connor 161 P.3d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Connor 161 P.3d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
2 ¶ 13 When the Defendant raises a justification defense, he is entitled to offer at *559 least some “proof of the victim’s reputation for violence.”
State v. Cano 743 P.2d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
State v. Cano 743 P.2d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
State v. Santanna 735 P.2d 757 Ariz. 1987
State v. Santanna 735 P.2d 757 Ariz. 1987
Gibson v. Gunsch 714 P.2d 1311 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Williams 685 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Williams 685 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
which we have also decided today.