DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Kerr, 690 P.2d 145.

41 citing documents.

  • State v. Bouhdida Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Bouhdida Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    P. 13.1(a); (explaining when an information is legally sufficient).
  • State v. Marquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Marquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    ¶37 Marquez requested the following instruction on constructive possession: “Constructive possession does not apply to an individual who merely lives with another person who can lawfully possess a firearm, and this other individual possesses a firearm in the home.” 1
  • State v. Vaughn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Vaughn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State of Arizona v. Jamonte Lawrence Olague 381 P.3d 269 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
  • State of Arizona v. Jamonte Lawrence Olague 381 P.3d 269 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
    P. He therefore urged this court to supplement the record “with no negative ramifications for [him].” It is an appellant’s duty to supplement an incomplete record, however, not this court’
  • State v. Turner 372 P.3d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Turner 372 P.3d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    ("It is the responsibility of defense counsel to ensure that any document necessary to defendant's argument is in the record on appeal.").
  • State v. Recchia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Recchia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Jones 218 P.3d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • State v. Jones 218 P.3d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • Chronis v. Steinle 208 P.3d 210 Ariz. 2009
  • Chronis v. Steinle 208 P.3d 210 Ariz. 2009
  • State of Arizona v. Jose Uzarraga Alvarez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
  • State of Arizona v. Jose Uzarraga Alvarez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
    under § 13-604 and aggravated under § 13-702(C)(11) based on prior felony convictions); P.2d 603 (App. 1988) (sentence for negligent homicide enhanced under § 13-604(F) for use of gun; deadly weapon not element of offense); P.2d 145 (App. 1984) (threatened use of weapon against police officers both element of offense and aggravating factor under § 13-702(C)(2)); P.2d 1353 (App. 1983) (death of victim both element of offense of second-degree murder and aggravating factor, § 13-702(C)(1); knife pr
  • State v. DePiano 926 P.2d 494 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Rickard-Hughes 895 P.2d 1036 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • State v. Rickard-Hughes 895 P.2d 1036 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
    Rule 13.2, Ariz.R.Crim.P.
  • State v. Lavers 814 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Lavers 814 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1991
    (court rejected argument that affidavit providing basis for search warrant was defective because the affidavit was never admitted into evidence); , (court rejected argument that motion to suppress should have been granted because counsel for the defense never introduced the warrant and attached list into evidence); -13 , -66 (1982).
  • State v. Rivera 811 P.2d 354 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
  • State v. Rivera 811 P.2d 354 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
  • State v. Mott 784 P.2d 278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Mott 784 P.2d 278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • London v. Green Acres Trust 765 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
  • London v. Green Acres Trust 765 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
    State v. Spinks, 156 Ariz. at 360 , 752 P.2d at 13
  • State v. Coley 763 P.2d 535 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
  • State v. Coley 763 P.2d 535 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
    Appellant’s reliance on Division One’s , is misplaced.
  • State v. Spinks 752 P.2d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Spinks 752 P.2d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Doolittle 746 P.2d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Doolittle 746 P.2d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Germain 723 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Germain 723 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
    We adopted the same rationale, without comment, , where we held that the threatened use of a deadly weapon could be used as an aggravating factor for the crime of aggravated assault.
  • State v. Crum 722 P.2d 971 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
  • State v. Crum 722 P.2d 971 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
    where the court concluded: “It is the responsibility of defense counsel to ensure that any document necessary to defendant’s argument is in the record on appeal.
  • State v. Young 720 P.2d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Young 720 P.2d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986