Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Coats, 797 P.2d 693.

25 citing documents.

State v. Olivas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Olivas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See United States v. Rowland, 464 F.3d 899, 908 (9th Cir. 2006) (stating tips are more reliable when informants reveal the basis of their knowledge); (stating a speaker’s personal observations of criminal conduct are presumed to be reliable).
State v. Gibson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Gibson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Sufficient particularity is determined by whether “the place to be searched is described with enough particularity to enable the executing officer to locate and identify the premises with reasonable effort, and whether there is any reasonable probability that another premise might be mistakenly searched.” -60 (App. 1990).
State v. Gaspar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gaspar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶18 The test to determine the sufficiency of the description is “whether the place to be searched is described with enough particularity to enable the executing officer to locate and identify the premises with reasonable effort, and whether there is any reasonable probability that another premise might be mistakenly searched.” –60 (App. 1990).
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mixton 447 P.3d 829 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
State v. Mixton 447 P.3d 829 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
See State v. Coats , , 158, , 697 (App. 1990) (citing Bolt , 142 Ariz. at 269 , 689 P.2d at 528 ).
State v. Havatone 443 P.3d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Havatone 443 P.3d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Coats , , 157-58, , 696-97 (App. 1990).
State of Arizona v. Thomas L. Dean 388 P.3d 24 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State of Arizona v. Thomas L. Dean 388 P.3d 24 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
As we have observed in this context, “[subjective good faith on the part of the officers is insufficient.”
State of Arizona v. Javier Francisco Navarro 382 P.3d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Javier Francisco Navarro 382 P.3d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
of the Arizona Constitution.”
State v. Hicks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hicks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
State v. Williams 909 P.2d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Williams 909 P.2d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
3405, 3420 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984); , (a search warrant must particularly describe the place to be searched).
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Superior Court 882 P.2d 1285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Superior Court 882 P.2d 1285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Arizona Podiatry Ass’n v. Director of Ins., , , ( , ).
State v. Evans 836 P.2d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Evans 836 P.2d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992