DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Schroeder, 804 P.2d 776.

68 citing documents.

  • State v. Davis 79 P.3d 64 Ariz. 2003
  • State v. Davis 79 P.3d 64 Ariz. 2003
    ¶ 56 But the State asserts, and the court of appeals agreed, , disposes of Davis’s claim.
  • State v. Petrak 8 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
  • State v. Petrak 8 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
    n. 4 , n. 4 (App.1990) (“duplicity” means “charging more than one crime in a single count or charging what can be multiple counts of the same crime in a single count”).
  • State v. Rosario 987 P.2d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
  • State v. Rosario 987 P.2d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
  • State v. Doerr 969 P.2d 1168 Ariz. 1998
  • State v. Doerr 969 P.2d 1168 Ariz. 1998
  • State v. Reimer 941 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
  • State v. Reimer 941 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
  • State v. Jones 937 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. Jones 937 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
    Defendant’s only defense was that the acts did not occur.
  • State v. Hamilton 868 P.2d 986 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Hamilton 868 P.2d 986 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Witwer 856 P.2d 1183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Witwer 856 P.2d 1183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Rushton 837 P.2d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
  • State v. Rushton 837 P.2d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
    (defendant was not prejudiced by arguably duplicitous indictment where each separate act of sexual abuse could have been the subject of a separate count subjecting defendant to the possibility of several felony convictions with multiple penalties).