Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Lopez, 822 P.2d 465.

26 citing documents.

State v. Rix 536 P.3d 253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Rix 536 P.3d 253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Bighorse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Bighorse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(holding that a party waived a constitutional claim by not raising it at the trial court).
State v. Montgomery Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Montgomery Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Salazar-Mercado, 234 Ariz. at 594 ¶ 15
State v. Stuart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Stuart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State of Arizona v. Cooperman 282 P.3d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. Cooperman 282 P.3d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Reed v. Burke 199 P.3d 702 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Reed v. Burke 199 P.3d 702 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
(holding that the defendant waived his argument because "[the] argument was not raised in the trial court”); , (declining to consider argument when the relevant transcript was not included in the record).
State v. Aguilar 97 P.3d 865 Ariz. 2004
State v. Aguilar 97 P.3d 865 Ariz. 2004
e of prior child molestation of victim beginning at age five in case charging child molestation of same victim at age nine); -58, -76 (App. 1996) (admitting evidence of prior sexual conduct with other minors in case charging sexual conduct with a minor, child molestation, and furnishing obscene or harmful items to minors); -18, -71 (App. 1991) (admitting evidence of sexual conduct with other minor victims in case charging sexual conduct with a minor); (admitting evidence of child molestation of
Feld v. Gerst 66 P.3d 1268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Feld v. Gerst 66 P.3d 1268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
(child molestation); Salazar, 181 Ariz. at 90 , 887 P.2d at 620 (App.1994)(attempted child molestation; evidence of prior rapes of twelve and fourteen year old girls may be admissible to show sexually aberrant propensity); , (sexual misconduct with children; alleged prior acts of molestation with same *1273 victims); , (when charged crime was sexual misconduct with minor, alleged prior similar acts of sodomy with minor allowed); , (child molestation involving the same victim); , (App
State v. Arner 988 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Arner 988 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
-92 , -22 (App.1994) (evidence of prior molestations partially admissible in case where expert testified at propensity hearing but not at trial); -18 , -71 (App.1991) (evidentiary predicate of Treadaway satisfied by psychologist’s testimony at pretrial hearing); -85 , -35 (App.1983) (opinion of psychiatrist who testified at in-camera hearing sufficient to establish relevancy, and thus admiss
State v. Mills 995 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Mills 995 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
(constitutional claims waived by failing to make the argument below)
State v. Rojas 868 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Rojas 868 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Hamilton 868 P.2d 986 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Hamilton 868 P.2d 986 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
(objections to insufficient foundation and form of the *409 question failed to preserve on appeal issue that testimony was beyond scope of permissible expert testimony); -07 , -15 (App.1991) (hearsay objection did not preserve
State v. Boldrey 861 P.2d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
State v. Boldrey 861 P.2d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
180 , 74 L.Ed.2d 147 (1982)