Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Johnson, 827 P.2d 1134.

56 citing documents.

City of Phoenix v. Mangum 912 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
City of Phoenix v. Mangum 912 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Zamora v. Superior Court 904 P.2d 1294 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Zamora v. Superior Court 904 P.2d 1294 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
“[W]here the statute itself is susceptible to more than one interpretation, the rule of lenity dictates that any doubt should be resolved in favor of the defendant.” -50 , -49 (App.1983) approved by , (citations omitted); , (rule of lenity mandates that doubts be resolved in defendant’s favor).
State v. Cid 892 P.2d 216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Cid 892 P.2d 216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
ry rule of statutory construction holds that, whenever possible, statutes which are in pari materia are read together and harmonized, see -71 , -26 (1985); , to avoid rendering any clause, sentence or word “superfluous, void, contradictory or insignificant.” , 827 * ( , ).