DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Ellis, 838 P.2d 1310.

40 citing documents.

  • In Re Marissa C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • In Re Marissa C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    While fair market value is a common measure used to calculate economic loss, the trial court “has discretion to use other measures of economic loss when fair market value will not make the victim whole.” (criminal case).
  • In Re Brigham H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • In Re Brigham H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    ¶14 The “court has wide discretion in setting restitution based on the facts of each case.” ¶ 11 (App. 2007) ().
  • State v. Matzdorff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State v. Matzdorff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Furthermore, because “[t]he purpose of restitution is to make the victim whole, not to punish,” a restitution award “should not compensate victims for more than their actual loss” and should be reduced by any benefits conferred to a victim by the defendant.
  • In Re Tommy G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • In Re Tommy G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    “A court has wide discretion in setting restitution based on the facts of each case.” ¶ 11 (App. 2007) (
  • State v. Reed 483 P.3d 221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • State v. Reed 483 P.3d 221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    (vacating restitution order where amount awarded was for purchase price, not fair market value, of personal property).
  • State v. Naranjo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Naranjo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Haver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Haver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • D.D. v. Hon granville/simpson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • D.D. v. Hon granville/simpson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • In Re Jesus C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • In Re Jesus C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Fair market value at the time of the loss is generally—but not always—an appropriate metric for measuring loss, and the court may employ other measures “when fair market value will not make the victim whole.”
  • State v. Fernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Fernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    see also Brockell, 187 Ariz. at 228 ("As to personal property, when it is damaged beyond repair, the usual measure of damage is market value less any salvage value.").
  • State v. Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    (noting evidence of stolen property’s fair market value includes original purchase price).
  • State of Arizona v. Michael Manuel Dixon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
  • State of Arizona v. Michael Manuel Dixon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
    “A court has wide discretion in setting restitution based on the facts of each case.”
  • In Re Andrew C. 160 P.3d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
  • In Re Andrew C. 160 P.3d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
    (“in assessing restitution for a loss of personal property, the measure of the victim’s full economic loss is the fair market value of the property at the time of the loss”).
  • In Re William L. 119 P.3d 1039 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
  • In Re William L. 119 P.3d 1039 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
    ¶ 15 , for the proposition that the measure of the victim’s economic loss cannot exceed the car’s fair market value, which in this case was fixed at $9,751.10 by the victim’s insurance company.
  • State of Arizona v. Clayton M. Guilliams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
  • State of Arizona v. Clayton M. Guilliams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
    195, P.2d 1310 (App. 1992).
  • State v. Madrid 85 P.3d 1054 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
  • State v. Madrid 85 P.3d 1054 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
    (noting that the trial court has “wide discretion” in setting restitution).
  • TANQUE VERDE UNIFIED SCHOOL v. Bernini 76 P.3d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
  • TANQUE VERDE UNIFIED SCHOOL v. Bernini 76 P.3d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
    Co., , (title policy insured's measure of damages was property's fair market value without title defect less fair market value with defect); , (in determining restitution for stolen property, "the measure of the victim's full economic loss is the fair market value"); , (tenant entitled to terminate lease for landlord's breach may recover as damages fair market value
  • In Re Ryan A. 39 P.3d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
  • In Re Ryan A. 39 P.3d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
  • State v. Lindsley 953 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
  • State v. Lindsley 953 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
  • State v. Wilson 914 P.2d 1346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. Wilson 914 P.2d 1346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996