Cited by

(“Because to order probation is to suspend the imposition of sentence, a defendant whose probation has been revoked is essentially in the position of never having been sentenced.”); see generally United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 1529, 1530 (9th Cir. 1994) (discussing that, under federal law, a probation

See, (“Although [subsection 13-603.C] is silent as to when restitution must be assessed, generally it is at the time of sentencing.”).

("The trial court is required to impose restitution to reimburse the victim for the full amount of his economic loss."); ("A trial court may order restitution be paid to others who have indemnified victims for losses caused by criminal acts.").

§ 13- 603(C) “is silent as to when restitution must be assessed.” (citations omitted).

KREAMER/MAGEE Decision of the Court ordered.”) ( P.2d 407 (App. 1993) and A.R.S.

(emphasizing appellate court lacks jurisdiction to correct error regarding mandatory restitution, absent appeal or cross-appeal); see also A.R.S.

Because this mandatory provision applies when a defendant enters into a plea agreement, and restitution is typically imposed at the time of sentencing, the term “sentence” in § 13- 4033(B) is most reasonably construed to include a post-judgment restitution order.

See Shenah v. Henderson, 106 Ariz. 399, P.2d 407 (App. 1993); P.2d 29 (App. 1982); (sentencing court may consider information obtained from 8 out-of-court sources so long as information is disclosed

at any time prior to the expiration or termination of the period of probation.” Further, when a court suspends the imposition of a sentence, “it retains jurisdiction over that individual’s punishment until the probationary term is completed or a prison sentence [is] subsequently imposed.” see also Contreras.