Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Carnegie, 850 P.2d 690.

66 citing documents.

State v. Gallentine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gallentine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
§ 13-712(B), a criminal defendant is entitled to credit for all time that is “actually spent in custody.” This court has explained that, for the purposes of that statute, a defendant is in custody beginning at the time of “actual incarceration in a prison or jail, not simply a restraint on one’s freedom.” STATE v. GALLENTINE Decision of the Court 690, 691 (App. 1993)
State v. Mitchell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Mitchell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
§ 13-712(B), a defendant shall be credited with “[a]ll time actually spent in custody pursuant to an offense until the prisoner is sentenced to imprisonment for such offense.” For purposes of calculating presentence incarceration, “‘custody’ begins when defendant is booked into a detention facility.” -54, -92 (App. 1993) (-16, -3 (App. 1990)).
State v. Maestas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Maestas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Presentence Incarceration Credit ¶15 Presentence incarceration credit is given for time spent in custody beginning on the day of booking, and ending on the day before sentencing.
State v. Cardenas-Salcido Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Cardenas-Salcido Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Eskivel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Eskivel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Thus, we have stated, “for purposes of presentence incarceration credit, ‘custody’ begins when a defendant is booked into a detention facility.” -54, -92 (App. 1993).
State v. Maldonado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Maldonado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶6 Presentence incarceration credit is given for time spent in custody beginning on the day of booking, and ending on the day before sentencing
State v. LYCHWICK 218 P.3d 1061 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. LYCHWICK 218 P.3d 1061 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Corp. of Ariz., , (counting the day plaintiff gave notice as a whole day toward minimum twenty-day notice requirement); , (pre-incarceration credit based on “time actually spent” does not require full twenty-four hour period to receive full-day credit).
State v. Cofield 107 P.3d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Cofield 107 P.3d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
“Arizona court decisions have consistently interpreted the ‘in custody' requirement of this statute to mean actual or constructive control of prison or jail authorities.” , , -16 , -3 (App.1990).