Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Williams, 898 P.2d 497.

25 citing documents.

State v. Termini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Termini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-64 (App. 1995) (three acts of anal intercourse that “occurred in very rapid succession during a single episode” and “were interrupted only to change positions” were “separate crime[s] which can be punished consecutively”); see also State v. Bell, 1 CA- CR 24-0298, 2025 WL 3764175 at *4, ¶ 23 (Ariz. App. Dec.
State v. Swindle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Swindle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
148 Ariz. at 85- 86 (noting that it is immaterial that punishable acts occur within a very short time span); -64 (App. 1995) superseded in part by rule (holding that multiple acts of sexual assault occurring in very rapid succession during a single episode can be considered separate offenses which does not prohibit consecutive sentences); -83 (App. 1993) (holding that imposing consecut
State v. Paez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Paez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
that is not an absolute requirement.” (citation omitted), superseded in part on other grounds by Ariz. R. Evid.
STATE OF ARIZONA v. STEVE FRANK McPHERSON 269 P.3d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
STATE OF ARIZONA v. STEVE FRANK McPHERSON 269 P.3d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Patches v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz. 204 P.3d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Brown 159 P.3d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Brown 159 P.3d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Keener 75 P.3d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Keener 75 P.3d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
457 n. 2, ¶ 10, , 132 n. 2 (App.1998); , and United States v. Sutton, 794 F.2d 1415, 1426 (9th Cir.1986), for support.
State v. Van Adams 984 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1999
State v. Van Adams 984 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1999
Gulbrandson, 184 Ariz. at 61 , 906 P.2d at 594
State v. Sanchez 967 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
State v. Sanchez 967 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
(arresting officer need not be in personal possession of all facts as long as probable cause exists from collective knowledge of all agents involved in operation).
State v. Eagle 992 P.2d 1122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Eagle 992 P.2d 1122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Terrazas 930 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Terrazas 930 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Ovind 924 P.2d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Ovind 924 P.2d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
section 13-4037 , we will amend the order for commitment to twenty-five years.
State v. Jones 916 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Jones 916 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995