Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Jones, 916 P.2d 1119.

24 citing documents.

State v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
(citation omitted); ¶ 20 (App. 2009) ("Kidnapping is accomplished when a defendant's threat or intimidation causes a victim to move from one place to another against her will.").
State v. Gray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Gray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
(stating that when one of two convictions based on one act must be vacated, the lesser conviction is generally vacated).
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Restraint need not be accomplished by physical control, and “so long as the [victim feels] compelled by fear to remain, the confinement continue[s].” (citing People v. Martinez, 150 Cal.App.3d 579 (1984)).
State v. Jurden 352 P.3d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Jurden 352 P.3d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Powers, 200 Ariz. at 127, ¶ 16 , 23 P.3d at 672 (vacating second conviction and sentence for multiplicitous offense); -08 , -24 (App.1995) (vacating second kidnapping conviction and sentence arising out of single, definite act).
State of Arizona v. Travis Hamilton Nereim 317 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Travis Hamilton Nereim 317 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
(lesser conviction vacated when double jeopardy violated).
State v. Williams 302 P.3d 683 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Braidick 295 P.3d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Braidick 295 P.3d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
¶ 4 Prior to sentencing, defendant moved to vacate one of the unlawful imprisonment convictions on double jeopardy grounds, , should apply to the lesser-ineluded offense of kidnapping because the restraint used here was one continuous act.
State v. Bustamante 274 P.3d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
State v. Bustamante 274 P.3d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
State v. Mason 238 P.3d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State v. Mason 238 P.3d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona v. Powers 23 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State of Arizona v. Powers 23 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Ariz. Const. art. II, § 10; Tinajero; see Dake, 675 So.2d at 1368
State v. Welch 12 P.3d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Chabolla-Hinojosa 965 P.2d 94 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Chabolla-Hinojosa 965 P.2d 94 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
(stating that when two convictions are improperly based on one act, the “lesser” conviction is the one to vacate); -02 , -72 (1967) (holding that, where marijuana was possessed for only one sale, the possession convictio