DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Hardwick, 905 P.2d 1384.

67 citing documents.

  • State of Arizona v. Jay David Ramsey, Sr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
    ____________________________________ JOHN PELANDER, Chief Judge CONCURRING: ____________________________________ PHILIP G. ESPINOSA, Presiding Judge 7 -57, -92 (App. 1995), Ramsey also argues the trial court violated his constitutional rights by citing his lack of remorse as an aggravating factor.
  • State of Arizona v. Juan Manuel Molina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
  • State of Arizona v. Juan Manuel Molina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
  • State v. Henderson 115 P.3d 601 Ariz. 2005
  • State v. Henderson 115 P.3d 601 Ariz. 2005
    (holding that without claim of error at trial, claim is waived); , (holding that because trial court incorrectly allowed inadmissible evidence over objection, review was for harmless error).
  • State v. Pena 104 P.3d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
  • State v. Pena 104 P.3d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
    -57 , -92 (App.1995) ( , ).
  • State v. Munninger 104 P.3d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
  • State v. Munninger 104 P.3d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
  • State v. Henderson 100 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
  • State v. Henderson 100 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
    (“A defendant is guilty when convicted and if he chooses not to publicly admit his guilt, that is irrelevant to a sentencing determination.”); , (“[I]t would be irrational or disingenuous to expect or require one who maintains his innocence to express contrition or remorse.”); -64 , -80 (App.1987) (distinguishing cases based on refusal to admit guilt and approvi
  • State v. Long 83 P.3d 618 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
  • State v. Long 83 P.3d 618 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
  • State v. Harvey 974 P.2d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • State v. Harvey 974 P.2d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • State v. Tinajero 935 P.2d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
  • State v. Tinajero 935 P.2d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
    When a convicted person maintains his innocence through sentencing, as Tinajero did here, his failure to acknowledge guilt “is irrelevant to a sentencing determination” and “offends the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.”