DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Johnson, 890 P.2d 641.

24 citing documents.

  • State v. Duong Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    “‘Likely’ has been interpreted literally and means ‘probable’ as compared to ‘possible.’”
  • State v. Aguirre Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    4 STATE v. STUTLER Decision of the Court challenging their guilty pleas.”
  • State v. Simental 563 P.3d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • State v. Simental 563 P.3d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    (explaining that the trial court may review the extended record to determine a factual basis for a guilty plea).
  • State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem Smith 475 P.3d 558 Ariz. 2020
  • State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem Smith 475 P.3d 558 Ariz. 2020
    at 505–06 ¶¶ 69–72 (holding that, with respect to the crime of child abuse under § 13-3623(A)(1), the State need not establish any mental state regarding the circumstances of the offense, but emphasizing that the mental states of “intentionally or knowingly” applied to the defendant’s actions); ¶ 26 n.7 (App. 2017) (to same effect); State v. (Joe M.) Johnson, (holding that under § 13-3623(B), which makes it illegal to place children in a physically dangerous environment, maintaining such a dange
  • Tina T. v. Department of Child Safety 339 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Tina T. v. Department of Child Safety 339 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    (“A factual basis is required for the purpose of shielding the innocent from conviction, rather than to provide a back-door for defendants to obviate finality by challenging their guilty pleas.”).
  • State of Arizona v. Raymond John 308 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
  • State of Arizona v. Raymond John 308 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
    (addressing factual basis of plea in post-conviction proceeding).
  • State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew Payne 306 P.3d 17 Ariz. 2013
  • State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew Payne 306 P.3d 17 Ariz. 2013
  • State v. Soto 224 P.3d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
  • State v. Soto 224 P.3d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969) (requiring knowing, voluntary, and intelligent waiver for valid guilty plea); -50 , -45 (App.1995) (reviewing whether sufficient factual basis supported plea).
  • In Re Leon G. 59 P.3d 779 Ariz. 2002
  • In Re Leon G. 59 P.3d 779 Ariz. 2002
    314 ¶ 68, (holding the SVP statute requires a probability, not a mere possibility of future dangerousness).
  • State v. Ehrlich 26 P.3d 481 Ariz. 2001
  • In Re Leon G. 26 P.3d 481 Ariz. 2001
  • State v. Ehrlich 26 P.3d 481 Ariz. 2001
    314 ¶ 68, , 800 ¶ 68 (App.1999) (holding the SVP statute requires a probability, not a mere possibility, of future dangerousness).
  • In Re Leon G. 26 P.3d 481 Ariz. 2001
    314 ¶ 68, , 800 ¶ 68 (App.1999) (holding the SVP statute requires a probability, not a mere possibility, of future dangerousness).
  • Martin v. Reinstein 987 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
  • Martin v. Reinstein 987 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
  • State v. Mahaney 975 P.2d 156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
  • State v. Mahaney 975 P.2d 156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999