Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Fatty, 724 P.2d 1256.
- State v. Harper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
State v. Harper
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 9 (App. 2020) (concluding that a dog may be a dangerous instrument); Schaffer, 202 Ariz. at 596 ¶¶ 14-19 (concluding that a prosethetic arm may be a dangerous instrument); ¶ 25 (App. 2021) (concluding that an iron cord may be a dangerous instrument); –91 (App. 1986) (concluding that a cloth may be a dangerous instrument when shoved down a person’s throat).
- State v. Alvarez Bojorquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- State v. Alvarez Bojorquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- State v. Morrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Morrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State of Arizona v. Amy Kay Gustafson 311 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
-
State of Arizona v. Amy Kay Gustafson
311 P.3d 258
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Ariz. 634, 637, (“whether or not an object [inoperable firearm] is a deadly or dangerous weapon is a jury question”); (to prove flare gun was dangerous instrument under circumstances of its use, state required to show it was readily capable of causing death or serious physical injury); - 90, -59 (App. 1986) (court determined jury could find sock constituted dangerous instrument).
- State v. FAR WEST WATER & SEWER INC. 228 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
State v. FAR WEST WATER & SEWER INC.
228 P.3d 909
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
*202 ¶ 117 As long as it is within statutory limits, this court will not disturb the sentence unless the trial court abused its discretion by showing “arbitrariness or eapriciousness or by failing to conduct an adequate investigation into the facts.”
- State v. Long 83 P.3d 618 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- State v. Long 83 P.3d 618 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- State v. Cazares 72 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
- State of Arizona v. Ernesto Luis Cazares Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
- State of Arizona v. Ernesto Luis Cazares Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
- State v. Cazares 72 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
- State v. Estrada 18 P.3d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
- State v. Estrada 18 P.3d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
- In Re Anthony H. 994 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
-
In Re Anthony H.
994 P.2d 407
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
(taking judicial notice of the fact that if a person cannot breathe, that person will die).
- State v. Salinas 880 P.2d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
- State v. Salinas 880 P.2d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
- State v. Carbajal 868 P.2d 1044 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
- State v. Carbajal 868 P.2d 1044 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
- State v. Webb 793 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Webb 793 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Vaughn 786 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Vaughn 786 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Gordon 778 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1989
-
State v. Gordon
778 P.2d 1204
Ariz. 1989
-90 , -59 (Ct.App.1986); , (jury determined automobile a dangerous instrument).
- State v. Doan 762 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- State v. Dixon 735 P.2d 761 Ariz. 1987
-
State v. Dixon
735 P.2d 761
Ariz. 1987
§ 13-708 (consecutive sentence)); -92 , -61 (App.1986)