Cited by

(“When counsel has filed an advocate’s brief on behalf of a defendant, it is neither the role nor the duty of this court to search the record [to verify facts]; that is the responsibility of defendant’s attorney.”).

We will not reverse a conviction for insufficient evidence “unless there is no substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” ¶ 12 (App. 2010) ().

–78 (App. 1996) (finding there is "no Anders-hybrid type of brief" and declining to "search the record for appealable issues" when the defendant submitted a brief arguing issues on the merits).

We will not set aside a conviction for insufficient evidence “unless there is no substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” ¶ 12 (App. 2010) ().

We need not do so, however, because “[w]hen an advocate’s brief has been filed on behalf of a defendant, we presume that counsel has raised all arguably meritorious issues[.]”

¶14 This court will not reverse a conviction “for insufficiency of the evidence unless there is no substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” ().

(“When counsel has filed an advocate’s brief on behalf of a defendant, it is neither the role nor the duty of this court to search the record for appealable issues; that is the responsibility of defendant’s attorney.”).

(“Even if a trial record is incomplete, we must assume that it supports the judgment unless there is ‘at least a credible and unmet allegation of reversible error.’”) (citation omitted).

We will only reverse a conviction for insufficient evidence if there is “no substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” ( ).

“was caught multiple times lying [and] fabricating stories.” This court will not reverse a conviction “for insufficiency of the evidence unless there is no substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” ( ).

Here, however, the analysis is somewhat different because the Arizona Supreme Court has held that: (1) robbery is a lesser-included offense of armed robbery, (2) theft is a lesser-included offense of robbery, –4 ¶ 15, –51 (2006); State v

¶6 This court will not reverse a conviction “for insufficiency of the evidence unless there is no substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” ( ).

2 , (“When counsel has filed an advocate’s brief on behalf of a defendant, it is neither the role nor the duty of this court to search the record for appeal-able issues; that is the responsibility of defendant’s attorney.”).

¶ 12 A conviction will not be reversed for insufficient evidence “unless there is no substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” , ( , ).

478 n. 4, , 555 n. 4 (App.1996) ("When filing an Anders brief in Maricopa County, rather than articulate 'arguable issues,’ counsel typically present a detailed statement of facts and procedure with appropriate references to the trial record.