Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Baca, 926 P.2d 528.
- State v. Delgarito 938 P.2d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-
State v. Delgarito
938 P.2d 107
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
DISCUSSION In order to “unclog an appellate system burdened with guilty plea and probation violation admission appeals and divert such cases to the Rule 32 process,” , the legislature enacted A.R.S.
- State v. Jimenez 935 P.2d 920 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-
State v. Jimenez
935 P.2d 920
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
(direct appeal of a Rule 24.3 motion to modify sentence imposed pursuant to a probation violation agreement is precluded by A.R.S.