Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Vasko, 971 P.2d 189.

55 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Jill Irene Paris-Sheldon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
5 Moreover, “a defendant may waive speedy trial rights by not objecting to the denial of speedy trial in a timely manner.” -96 (App. 1998) (defendant not entitled to dismissal for Rule 8 violation absent showing of prejudice).
State v. Torres 75 P.3d 142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Torres 75 P.3d 142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Although Defendant asserts his speedy trial rights are both constitutional and rule-based, we address only the applicable Arizona speedy trial rules because they are "more restrictive than the constitutional right to speedy trial," ¶ 19 , and "the unspecified length of delay necessary to a Sixth Amendment violation ...
In Re the Marriage of Dorman 9 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In Re the Marriage of Dorman 9 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
See Taliaferro, 186 Ariz. at 223 , 921 P.2d at 23 (denial of notice of peremptory change of judge must be challenged by special action); , (denial of motion to remand to grand jury must be challenged by special action); , (denial of *303 dismissal for violation of speedy trial rights must be challenged by special action if violation purely technical and nonprejudicial); , (order modifying rate of restitution must be challenged by special act