Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Donald, 10 P.3d 1193.
- State v. Darelli 72 P.3d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
-
State v. Darelli
72 P.3d 1277
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
¶ 23 ¶ 1 , this court considered whether the loss of a favorable plea bargain precipitated by ineffective assistance of counsel inflicted a “constitutionally significant injury upon a defendant who has received a fair trial.” In holding that it did, we considered that a trial court conf
- Cranmer v. State 63 P.3d 1036 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
- State v. Sepahi 61 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
- State of Arizona v. Cranmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
-
State of Arizona v. Cranmer
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
329, 331, (within prosecutor’ s discretion to admit defendant into child molester’ s treatment program); (“ Discretion over plea bargaining is a core prosecutorial power, but .
-
Cranmer v. State
63 P.3d 1036
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
ally or in excess of his [or her] powers.” , .(whether to admit defendant into Adult Diversion Program is decision within prosecutor’s discretion); , (within prosecutor’s discretion to admit defendant into child molester’s treatment program); , (“Discretion over plea bargaining is a core prosecutorial power, but ...
- State v. Sepahi 61 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
- State v. Cox 37 P.3d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
-
State v. Cox
37 P.3d 437
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
¶ 29 , (review denied Mar.
- Andrews v. Willrich 29 P.3d 880 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
- Andrews v. Willrich 29 P.3d 880 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
- State v. Espinosa 29 P.3d 278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
- State v. Espinosa 29 P.3d 278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001