Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.
- State v. Nettrour Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Palmares
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
-
State v. Nettrour
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
- State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Williams
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
- State v. Balderas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- State v. Kee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Kee
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
–38 ¶¶ 30–31 (App. 1999).
-
State v. Balderas
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
–38 ¶¶ 30–31 (App. 1999).
- State v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- State v. Betrue Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Robertson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
–38 ¶¶ 30–31 (App. 1999).
-
State v. Campbell
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
–38 ¶¶ 30–31 (App. 1999).
-
State v. Betrue
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
–38 ¶¶ 30–31 (App. 1999).
- State v. Strover Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Strover
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- 69, ¶¶ 19-26 (2005); ¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
- State v. Piper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Piper
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
- State v. Maldonado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Maldonado
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
- State v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Martin
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
–69, ¶¶ 19–26 (2005); ¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
- State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Johnson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Johnson
- State v. Villa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- State v. Solano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Solano
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
- State v. Villa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Williams
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999); see also Ritch, 160 Ariz. at 499.
- State v. Siegfried Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
State v. Siegfried
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See Leon, 104 Ariz. at 298- 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
- State v. Buehler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- State v. Hedgecock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- State v. Hedgecock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- State v. Buehler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- State v. Kroll Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- State v. Ruiz Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
State v. Kroll
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining Kroll’s conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against him
-
State v. Ruiz Espinoza
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
–69, ¶¶ 19–26 (2005); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
- State v. May Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
State v. May
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Leon, 204 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
- State v. Thammakhanty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
State v. Thammakhanty
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
- State v. Perez-Gutierrez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
State v. Perez-Gutierrez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 81 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
- State v. Nunez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024