Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1298 citing documents.

State v. Brooks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Tabor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Tabor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738
State v. Stroble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Stroble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738
State v. Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Gomez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Gomez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
K E S S L E R, Judge: ¶1 Appellant Jesse Luna appeals his convictions for two counts of aggravated driving under the influence (“DUI”) and two concurrent eight-year prison terms.1 Counsel for Luna filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Ballesteros Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Ballesteros Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Counsel for Ballesteros filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Dawe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Long Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Long Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Dawe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hunsaker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Mattison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hunsaker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Mattison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738
State v. Medina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Marshall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Medina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Marshall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 738
State v. Gleba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Gleba Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Mangan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Fernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Mangan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Fernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Anders, 386 U.S. 738; Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000)
State v. Gurule Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Gurule Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Parsons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Huffman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Huffman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738
State v. Parsons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738
State v. Wagoner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Wagoner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Puccini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Massey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Puccini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Counsel for Wright filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Massey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Granauro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015