Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Hurley, 4 P.3d 455.

56 citing documents.

State v. Foster 559 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Foster 559 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State of Arizona v. Lazaro Enrique Villa, Jr. 548 P.3d 1146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Lazaro Enrique Villa, Jr. 548 P.3d 1146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State v. Miranda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Miranda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“A trial judge is presumed to be free of bias and prejudice.” ¶ 24 (App. 2000) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
State v. Teran 510 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Teran 510 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Balli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Balli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶25 “A trial judge is presumed to be free of bias and prejudice.” ¶ 24 (App. 2000) (citations omitted).
State v. Dustin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dustin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“We review the trial court’s decision to give or refuse a jury instruction for an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 9 (App. 2000).
State v. Pintarich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Pintarich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
3 STATE v. PINTARICH Decision of the Court ¶6 “A trial judge is presumed to be free of bias and prejudice.” ¶ 38 (App. 2005) ( ¶ 24 (App. 2000)).
State v. Wood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Wood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Buttita Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Buttita Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶8 “A trial judge is presumed to be free of bias and prejudice.” ¶ 24 (App. 2000).
State v. Candler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Candler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hurley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hurley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Silva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Silva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
instruction to the jury, in its entirety, incorporating the following modification: “In order to find the defendant guilty of first degree felony murder, you must find that the death was proximately caused by the acts of the defendant or another person.” ¶35 We review a superior court’s decision to grant or deny a requested jury instruction for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 9 (App. 2000), but review de novo whether instructions accurately state the law.
State v. Coffelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Coffelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 38 (App. 2005); -05, ¶ 24 (App. 2000).
State v. Mazzola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Mazzola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Prescott v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Prescott v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-05, ¶ 24, -60 (App. 2000).
State v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-05, ¶ 24, -60 (App. 2000).
State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 14, (“[R]ecklessly is a lesser- included mental state of knowingly.” (citation omitted)); (“Even though second degree trafficking requires the state to show that defendant acted recklessly, that culpable mental state wa
State v. Satovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Satovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶19 A trial judge is presumed to be unbiased, and to rebut the presumption, a party must prove bias or prejudice by a preponderance of the evidence, -05, ¶ 24, -60 (App. 2000).
O'Connor v. Arizona Medical Board Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
O'Connor v. Arizona Medical Board Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 24, (“A trial judge is presumed to be free of bias and prejudice.” (citations omitted)).
Juenger v. Nyahay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Juenger v. Nyahay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In the absence of evidence in the record to the contrary, “a trial judge is presumed to be free of bias and prejudice.” ¶ 38, ( ¶ 24, ) (internal quotation marks omitted).
State of Arizona v. Jesus Xavier Almaguer 303 P.3d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Jesus Xavier Almaguer 303 P.3d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
3 on the state’s burden to disprove his claim he had acted in self-defense as to the lesser offenses of manslaughter and negligent homicide, and also erred by denying his request for instructions defining the terms “proximate cause” and “voluntary act.” “We review the trial court’s decision to give or refuse a jury instruction for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Arizona v. Scott Allen King Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Scott Allen King Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Jay David Ramsey, Sr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Jay David Ramsey, Sr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005