Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Miranda, 10 P.3d 1213.

26 citing documents.

State v. Hall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Hall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
–30, ¶¶ 16–17 (App. 2000) (each of three shots fired—one into the ground and two toward two victims— “constituted a separate act” by the defendant); (“[A]lthough several shots be fired in such quick succession that they constitute, in effect, but one act, still, the resul
State v. Lohmeier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Lohmeier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 20 (App. 2000) (multiple counts of disorderly conduct did not violate double jeopardy where the defendant fired a series of three gunshots).
State v. Burgess 428 P.3d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Burgess 428 P.3d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 65 (App. 2002) (noting that the trial court appropriately instructed the jurors that they were not to consider punishment in reaching their verdict); ¶ 9 (App. 2000) (“A lesser-included-offense instruction is proper only if (1) the lesser offense is composed of some, but not all, of the elements of the greater crime so that it is impossible to commit the greater without committing the lesser offense, and (2) the evidence supports an instruction on the lesser o
State v. Peltz 391 P.3d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. Peltz 391 P.3d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
n.7 , , 243 n.7 (App. 2007) (noting that, even if judgment of acquittal granted on charged offense, “lesser included offense would still be applicable”); , (instruction on lesser-included offense proper if supported by evidence).
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State of Arizona v. Austin Garrett Hansen 345 P.3d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Austin Garrett Hansen 345 P.3d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
In the former, our supreme court has required such action in Rich, 184 Ariz. at 181 , 907 P.2d at 1384 , and we are not at liberty to ignore this precedent, , aff'd
State v. Pino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Pino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
§ 13-1204(A)(2).); ¶ 13, (“[D]isorderly conduct under section 13-2904(A)(6) is a lesser- included offense of aggravated assault under section 13-1204(A)(2).”).
State v. Krentiras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Krentiras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
An individual victim’s “peace” can be disturbed if the victim is “in repose of mind and peaceful intent” prior to the commencement of the disorderly act, or if during a period of emotional upset, the defendant’s action “excites disquietude or fear.” n.2, ¶ 11, n.2 (App. 2000) (citations omitted).
William Allen Lear v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
William Allen Lear v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Javier Fimbres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State of Arizona v. Javier Fimbres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
A store security specialist testified that Fimbres used MasterCard number “9221” to purchase a video game system for the decisions of the supreme court and has ‘no authority to overrule, modify, or disregard them.’” approved, P.3d 506 (2001)
State of Arizona v. Alvin Edward Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Alvin Edward Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
See Fell, 115 P.3d at 601, P.3d 902 (App. 2004)
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Elec. Power Co-Op., Inc. 83 P.3d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Followed Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Elec. Power Co-Op., Inc. 83 P.3d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by