Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Keegan, 35 P.3d 105.

27 citing documents.

GOLDWATER v. PHOENIX Ariz. 2026
Goldwater v. City of Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Goldwater v. City of Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Newspapers, -49 ¶ 18 (App. 2001) (“Th[e] ‘best interests of the state’ standard is not confined to the narrow interest of either the official who holds the records or the agency he or she serves.
Jarron Smith v. Town of Marana 524 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
Jarron Smith v. Town of Marana 524 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
Newspapers, (quoting Carlson, 141 Ariz. at 491).
Karen Fann v. Hon. kemp/american Oversight 515 P.3d 1275 Ariz. 2022
Karen Fann v. Hon. kemp/american Oversight 515 P.3d 1275 Ariz. 2022
Newspapers, ¶ 33 (App. 2001)).
Fann v. Hon. kemp/american 505 P.3d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Fann v. Hon. kemp/american 505 P.3d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 8 (2009); Phoenix Newspapers, ¶ 33 (App. 2001) (“The core purpose of the [PRL] is to allow the public access to official records and other government information so that the public may monitor the performance of government officials and their employees.” (citation and quotation omitted)).
Fann v. Hon. kemp/american Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Fann v. Hon. kemp/american Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Phoenix Newspapers, ¶ 11 (App. 2001).
Terrell v. Torres 438 P.3d 681 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Terrell v. Torres 438 P.3d 681 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See also Phoenix Newspapers, ¶ 21 (App. 2001) (“We can decide whether the superior court correctly balanced the interests only after considering what it found as facts.”).
American Civil Liberties Union v. Arizona Department of Child Safety 377 P.3d 339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
American Civil Liberties Union v. Arizona Department of Child Safety 377 P.3d 339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See also Judicial Watch, Inc., 228 Ariz. at 397, ¶ 17 , 267 P.3d at 1189 (“the burden of producing public records can outweigh the public’s interest in inspecting those records”); Phoenix Newspapers, -49, ¶ 18 , -10 (App. 2001) (“best interests of the state” exception to disclosure “not confined to the narrow interest of either the official who holds the records or the agency he or she serves!;] [i]t includes the overall interests of the government and the people,” including the government’s ad
Beau Hodai v. the City of Tucson and Tucson Police Department 365 P.3d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Beau Hodai v. the City of Tucson and Tucson Police Department 365 P.3d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Newspapers, -10 (App. 2001).
CONGRESS ELEMENTARY SCH. DIST. v. Warren 251 P.3d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
CONGRESS ELEMENTARY SCH. DIST. v. Warren 251 P.3d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Phoenix Newspapers, ¶ 19
Schoeneweis v. Hamner 221 P.3d 48 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Schoeneweis v. Hamner 221 P.3d 48 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
3 Id,.; Phoenix Newspapers, -49, ¶¶ 18-19 , -10 (App.2001).
Lake v. City of Phoenix 218 P.3d 1004 Ariz. 2009
Lake v. City of Phoenix 218 P.3d 1004 Ariz. 2009
¶ 7 Arizona’s public records law serves to “open 5 government activity to public scrutiny.” ¶ 11, see also Phoenix Newspapers, ¶ 33, (“The core purpose of the public records law is to allow the public access to official records and other government information so that the public may monitor the performance of government officials and their employees.”) (citation omitted).
Phoenix New Times, L.L.C. v. Arpaio 177 P.3d 275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Phoenix New Times, L.L.C. v. Arpaio 177 P.3d 275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
hing that it promptly provided documents, and thus that a request was not wrongfully delayed or denied, it would turn on its head the core purpose of the public records law, which is to “to allow the public access to official records and other government information so that the public may monitor the performance of government officials and their employees,” See Phoenix Newspapers, ¶ 33
West Valley View, Inc. v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office 165 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
West Valley View, Inc. v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office 165 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007