Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Campbell v. SZL Properties, Ltd., 62 P.3d 966.

71 citing documents.

Clusiau v. Clusiau Enterprises, Inc. 236 P.3d 1194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Campbell v. SZL Props., Ltd., ¶ 8
Tripati v. FORWITH 219 P.3d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Tripati v. FORWITH 219 P.3d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Minjares v. State 219 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Minjares v. State 219 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
See Campbell v. SZL Props., Ltd., ¶ 8 , Better Homes Constr., ¶ 10
Calpine Construction Finance Co. v. Arizona Depatment of Revenue 211 P.3d 1228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Calpine Construction Finance Co. v. Arizona Depatment of Revenue 211 P.3d 1228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
o v. City of Lake Havasu, , 198 n. 5, (even if Rule 28(c)(1) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure permits citation of unpublished authority for collateral estoppel purposes, “it does not help Appellant here because offensive collateral estoppel generally is unavailable against the government.”); see generally Campbell v. SZL Props., Ltd,., , 223 n. 1, ¶ 11, , 968 n. 1 (App.2003) (“In contradistinction to the Arizona rule, the offensive use of collateral estoppel is not prohibited in
Picaso v. Tucson Unified School District 171 P.3d 1219 Ariz. 2007
Picaso v. Tucson Unified School District 171 P.3d 1219 Ariz. 2007
Campbell v. SZL Props., Ltd., ¶ 8
Picaso v. Tucson Unified School District 154 P.3d 364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Picaso v. Tucson Unified School District 154 P.3d 364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Campbell v. SZL Props., Ltd.
Corbett v. Manorcare of America, Inc. 146 P.3d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Corbett v. Manorcare of America, Inc. 146 P.3d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
(res judicata); Campbell v. SZL Props., Ltd., (collateral estoppel); Mercy Healthcare Ariz., (statutory interpretation).
Pima County v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Pima County v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Campbell v. SZL Props., Ltd.
Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood 98 P.3d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood 98 P.3d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
(setting forth elements of collateral estoppel).
State v. Whelan 91 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Whelan 91 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Motors Corp., ¶ 9 , (emphasis added); see also Campbell v. SZL Properties, Ltd., ¶ 9 , (same).
Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, L.L.C. v. Naranjo 79 P.3d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, L.L.C. v. Naranjo 79 P.3d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
See Standage Ventures, , Campbell v. SZL Props., Ltd.