Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Flanders v. Maricopa County, 54 P.3d 837.

27 citing documents.

Sanchez v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Sanchez v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51, 60 (2011); ¶ 61 (App. 2002) (“Liability [under 42 U.S.C.
Haz-Mat v. Oxnard Commerceplex Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Haz-Mat v. Oxnard Commerceplex Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Williams, 248 Ariz. at 317 ¶ 26; ¶ 5 (App. 2002) (stating this court will not set aside a jury verdict just because the jury could have drawn different inferences or conclusions).
Sarkis v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sarkis v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Hawkins v. Secura Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Hawkins v. Secura Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 49 (App. 2002) (“In considering whether sufficient evidence supports the jury verdict, [this court] .
State v. Bankers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Bankers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See, ¶ 65, (holding that an issue raised for the first time in a motion for judgment as a matter of law following the verdict is waived); (holding that a plaintiff waived his claim of manifest injustice by raising it for
Thienes v. City Center Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Thienes v. City Center Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Kilrain v. Adoc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kilrain v. Adoc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
A. Individual Liability under § 1983 ¶15 A prison official is liable under § 1983 if his “deliberate indifference to a substantial risk of serious harm to an inmate violates the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.” ¶ 50
US Express v. Leland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
US Express v. Leland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶18 P. 203 (1924), P.3d 837 (App. 2002), for her assertion the trial court, rather than the aggrieved party, should bring unresponsive verdicts to the jury’s attention and send the jury back for further deliberation.
STATE, EX REL. HORNE v. Campos 250 P.3d 201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
STATE, EX REL. HORNE v. Campos 250 P.3d 201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Simon v. MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER 234 P.3d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Simon v. MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER 234 P.3d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
¶ 16 , mandates dismissal when a plaintiff erroneously names a non-jural entity in a caption.
Braillard v. Maricopa County, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Braillard v. Maricopa County, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
involves reckless or callous indifference to the federally protected rights of others.” Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 56 (1983); (upholding punitive damages award on this basis).
Higgins v. Assmann Electronics, Inc. 173 P.3d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Higgins v. Assmann Electronics, Inc. 173 P.3d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
We will not “reweigh the facts or comb through the record for evidence supporting a conclusion or inference different from that reached by the jury.” ¶ 49
White v. Greater Arizona Bicycling Association 163 P.3d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007