Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Marriage of McNutt v. McNutt, 49 P.3d 300.

109 citing documents.

Valento v. Valento 240 P.3d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Strait v. Strait 224 P.3d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Strait v. Strait 224 P.3d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
We review findings of fact under a clearly erroneous standard; “however, we draw our own legal conclusions from facts found or implied in the judgment.’ ” ¶ 21 , ( ¶ 6 , ).
Pullen v. Pullen 222 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Pullen v. Pullen 222 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
3 ¶ 20 , (stating the Little balancing test should apply when obligor accepts lower paying employment).
Engel v. Landman 212 P.3d 842 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Engel v. Landman 212 P.3d 842 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
B. Attribution of Childcare Expenses ¶ 21 “Generally, we review child support awards for abuse of discretion.” ¶ 6 , ( , ).
Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission 121 P.3d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission 121 P.3d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
¶ 26 , (citing The American Heritage Dictionary 1670 (3d ed.1992)); see also Black’s Law Dictionary 1237 (5th ed.1979) (defining “should” in part as “ordinarily implying duty or obligation” and “not'normally synonymous with ‘may’ ”).