Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Marriage of McNutt v. McNutt, 49 P.3d 300.
- Strait v. Strait 224 P.3d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
Strait v. Strait
224 P.3d 997
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
We review findings of fact under a clearly erroneous standard; “however, we draw our own legal conclusions from facts found or implied in the judgment.’ ” ¶ 21 , ( ¶ 6 , ).
- Pullen v. Pullen 222 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
-
Pullen v. Pullen
222 P.3d 909
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
3 ¶ 20 , (stating the Little balancing test should apply when obligor accepts lower paying employment).
- Engel v. Landman 212 P.3d 842 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
-
Engel v. Landman
212 P.3d 842
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
B. Attribution of Childcare Expenses ¶ 21 “Generally, we review child support awards for abuse of discretion.” ¶ 6 , ( , ).
- Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission 121 P.3d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
-
Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
121 P.3d 843
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
¶ 26 , (citing The American Heritage Dictionary 1670 (3d ed.1992)); see also Black’s Law Dictionary 1237 (5th ed.1979) (defining “should” in part as “ordinarily implying duty or obligation” and “not'normally synonymous with ‘may’ ”).