Cited by

v. Burton, ¶ 14 (App. 2003) (“An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.”).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003) (holding that when a party fails to produce “transcripts or other documents necessary” for the appellate court “to consider the issues raised on appeal,” the appellate court assumes that the missing portions support the superior court’s findings and conclusions); Fletcher, 137 Ariz. at 498.

v. Burton, , (court of appeals lacks jurisdiction over appeal from civil contempt adjudication).

v. Burton, ¶ 20 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 14 (App. 2003) (citation omitted).

v. Burton, ¶ 18 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 8 (App. 2003); and Austin v. State ex rel.

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 8 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, , (Arizona court may exercise personal jurisdiction over non-resident if person "submits to the court’s jurisdiction by consent, enters a general appearance, or files a responsive document having the effect of waiving a contest to personal jurisdiction").

v. Burton, ¶ 18 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003); -42, ¶ 19 (App. 1998); ).

v. Burton, ¶ 14 (App. 2003)).

v. Burton, ¶ 16, (upholding the denial of a modification of child support in the absence of a hearing transcript).

v. Burton, ¶ 8 (App. 2003)).

v. Burton, ¶ 16, (noting appellant’s responsibility to ensure complete record on appeal and holding “[w]hen a party fails to do so, we assume the missing portions of the record would support the [ALJ]’s findings and conclusions” ( (App. 199