Cited by

& ¶ 23 (App. 2004) (“Implied in every judgment, in addition to express findings made by the court, is any additional finding that is necessary to sustain the judgment, if reasonably supported by the evidence, and not in conflict with the express findings.”) (citation omitted); Switzer Bros. v. Locklin, 297 F.2d 39

& Health Corp. v. Maricopa County , , ¶ 12, (party claiming equitable estoppel must show reasonable reliance).

& ¶ 19 (App. 2008) (concluding, because the trial court denied the motion for partial summary judgment due to the existence of material factual disputes, party had waived its right to appeal the sufficiency of the claims at issue by not reasserting the issue during or after trial).

& ¶ 10 (App. 2004) (citing Twin City Fire Ins.

& ¶ 13 n.3 (App. 2004) (“[E]vidence of a settlement agreement otherwise precluded by Rule 408 may be offered for a purpose other than to prove or disprove liability or the validity of a claim .

& ¶ 10, (citations omitted).

& ¶ 10 (App. 2004) (questions of estoppel are fact-intensive and this court will “defer to the trial court with respect to any factual findings explicitly or implicitly made, 10 BRUBACHER v. PROPAGANDA et al. Decision of the Cou

& ¶ 10 (App. 2004) (“Questions of estoppel, including reasonable reliance, are fact-intensive inquiries.”).

& ¶ 39 (App. 2004); Alta Vista Plaza Ltd. v. Insulation Specialists Co., Inc.

& ¶ 23 (App. 2004) (“[I]mplied in every judgment, in addition to express findings made by the court, is any additional finding that is necessary to sustain the judgment, if reasonably supported by the evidence, and not in conflict with the express findings.”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

& ¶ 19 (App. 2004) (“[I]n cases that have gone to trial, a party who wants to preserve a summary-judgment issue for appeal, with a possible exception for a purely legal issue, must do so by reasserting it in a Rule 50 motion .

& (party seeking to preserve summary-judgment issue for appeal, “with a possible exception for a purely legal issue, must do so by reasserting it in a Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law or other post- trial motion”).

& ¶ 39, (“A claim is liquidated if the plaintiff provides a basis for precisely calculating the amounts owed.”).