Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Smith v. Arizona Long Term Care System, 84 P.3d 482.

26 citing documents.

University Medical v. Health Choice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
University Medical v. Health Choice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Batty v. Az Medical Brd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Batty v. Az Medical Brd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See, e.g., Ariz. Cannabis Nurses Ass’n v. Ariz. Dep’t of Health Servs., ¶ 8 (App. 2017); ¶ 9 (App. 2007); ¶ 14 (App. 2004).
Parsons v. Adohs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Parsons v. Adohs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Danam v. Az Board of Education Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Danam v. Az Board of Education Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sunflower v. Ahcccs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sunflower v. Ahcccs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Because the Director’s Decision “is the final administrative decision entitled to deference,” ¶ 14 (App. 2004), this court defers to and will affirm the agency’s factual findings if they are supported by substantial evidence, Gaveck, 222 Ariz. at 436 ¶ 11.
Sunflower v. Ahcccs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sunflower v. Ahcccs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
v. AHCCCS, but determine only whether substantial evidence supports the administrative decision, ¶ 14 (App. 2004).
McGovern v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration 384 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
McGovern v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration 384 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-21, ¶¶ 14, 19, -86 (App. 2004).
Maricopa v. Employee Merit Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Maricopa v. Employee Merit Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
§ 12- 910(E); ¶ 14 (App. 2014); ¶ 19 (App. 2004).
Callen v. Rogers 168 P.3d 907 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Callen v. Rogers 168 P.3d 907 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Parkinson v. Guadalupe Public Safety Retirement Local Board 151 P.3d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Parkinson v. Guadalupe Public Safety Retirement Local Board 151 P.3d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Ritland v. Arizona State Board of Medical Examiners 140 P.3d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Ritland v. Arizona State Board of Medical Examiners 140 P.3d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment Sys., -62, ¶ 12 , -05 (App.2004) (agency head, *190 not ALJ, renders final agency decision subject to judicial review); ¶ 15 , (same).
Arizona Commercial Diving Services, Inc. v. Applied Diving Services, Inc. 129 P.3d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Arizona Commercial Diving Services, Inc. v. Applied Diving Services, Inc. 129 P.3d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
On appeal, “we review the superior court’s judgment to determine whether the record contains evidence to support the judgment.” ¶ 19 , (citing Ethridge v. Ariz. St.
J.L.F. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 91 P.3d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
J.L.F. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 91 P.3d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by