Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Merlina v. Jejna, 90 P.3d 202.

72 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Travis Hamilton Nereim 317 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Williams 302 P.3d 683 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State of Arizona v. Guillermo C. Becerra 291 P.3d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Guillermo C. Becerra 291 P.3d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Should this issue recur on remand, Becerra would be entitled to a and may not be convicted and sentenced on both counts.
State of Arizona v. Xavier Hipolito Estrella 286 P.3d 150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. Xavier Hipolito Estrella 286 P.3d 150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
The state may charge both lesser-included and greater offenses, , but a defendant may not be convicted for both
Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 282 P.3d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 282 P.3d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
STATE OF ARIZONA v. STEVE FRANK McPHERSON 269 P.3d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
STATE OF ARIZONA v. STEVE FRANK McPHERSON 269 P.3d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
& n.4, & n.4 (App. 2004); see also United States v. Bobb, 577 F.3d 1366, 1372 (11th Cir. 2009) (acknowledging unlawful multiplicitous convictions must be vacated even with concurrent sentences); United States v. Davenport, 519 F.3d 940, 947 (9th Cir. 2008) (same).
State v. Vega 262 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Vega 262 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State of Arizona v. Luis Enrique Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Luis Enrique Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
In his opening brief, Ortega also asserted that count three, sexual abuse of a minor under fifteen, was a lesser included offense of sexual conduct with a minor.
State v. Brown 177 P.3d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State v. Brown 177 P.3d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
However, “[m]ultiplicitous charges do not subject a defendant to double punishment so long as multiple punishments are not imposed.” , (emphasis added).
Adrian E. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 158 P.3d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Adrian E. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 158 P.3d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Stoudamire v. State of Arizona 141 P.3d 776 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Stoudamire v. State of Arizona 141 P.3d 776 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Villalpando v. Reagan 121 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Villalpando v. Reagan 121 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005