Cited by

An abuse of discretion occurs either when the court misapplies the law in reaching its decision or “when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision.” ¶ 5, ¶ 23

-56, ¶ 18, -81 (App. 2004).

The decree, however, clearly recognized that Husband received bonuses by noting that Husband earned “$195,108 annually or $16,259 gross income per month.” Because it is clear that the court considered Husband’s earnings, including his bonuses, and the “evidence is presumed to have been fully considered by the court prior to issuing its decision,” ¶ 18, we find no error.

-56, ¶¶ 17-18, -81 (App. 2004).

¶ 10 , (child support award is within family court’s sound discretion and will not be disturbed on appeal absent abuse of discretion).

An abuse of discretion occurs “when the trial court commits an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion.”

5 , -81 (App.2004) (evidence admitted in trial court “presumed to have been fully considered”).

Although the court did not detail the parties‟ financial resources in the context of its fee award, we presume it fully considered the relevant evidence.5 -81 (App. 2004) (evidence admitted in trial court “presumed to have been fully considered”).

(trial courts presumed to know law and correctly apply it).

-55, ¶ 12 , -80 (App.2004).

exercising its discretion.” Ross, 214 Ariz. at 283, ¶ 21 , 151 P.3d at 1261 ( ¶ 23 , ).

-55, ¶ 12 , -80 (App.2004).

Ariz. Newspapers Ass’n, , -55, ¶ 12 , -80 (App.2004).

¶ 23, 58, ¶ 35 , 883 (App.2004) (citing Grant v. Ariz. Pub.

*188 ¶ 18 Although we presume that the trial court knows the law and applies the correct standard, ¶ 32 , that presumption may be rebutted by the record.

-56, ¶ 18 , -81 (App.2004).

¶ 12 , (noting court need not resort to secondary rules of construction when language is clear); J.L.F.