Cited by

¶ 8 (App. 2015); ¶ 6 (App. 2006).

We review de novo the trial court’s interpretation of a statute, ¶ 6 (App. 2006), and look to the plain meaning of the statutory language as the best indicator of its meaning, New Sun Bus.

We review the interpretation of a statute de novo, ¶ 6, and look first to the plain meaning of the statutory language as the most reliable indicator of its construction, New Sun Bus.

163 n. 2, ¶ 20, , 250 n. 2 (App.2006) .

¶ 8 , (“A park is typically defined as ‘[a]n area of land set aside for public use, as ...

Corp., 836 F.2d 1055, 1060 (7th Cir. 1987); , 163 n. 2, ¶ 20, , 250 n. 2 (App.2006) (a statute’s language is more important than its title or heading).

eading this text, Rule 407 applies whenever “measures are taken” “after an event.” The rule does not require that the measures be “remedial to the specific event,” or “taken in response to the event,” or “taken in connection with the event.” 4 See Boyko & Vacca, supra, at 664 (“It is worth noting that the word ‘remedial’ does not appear in the body of Rule 407.”); , 163 n. 2, ¶ 20, , 250 n. 2 (App.2006) (“The actual language of the statutes, rather than the titles or headings, is most import

163 n. 2, ¶120, , 250 n. 2 (App.2006).

163 n. 2, ¶20, , 250 n. 2 (App.2006) (“Although title and section headings of statutes are not law, we may look to them for guidance.”); , (“Although section headings are not law ...

*580 ¶ 14 , 160 n. 1, ¶ 3, , 247 n. 1 (App.2006), as support that Arizona law requires Gilbert to establish a prima facie case that it evaluated and balanced the least private injury to QCS.