Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Regal Homes, Inc. v. CNA Insurance, 171 P.3d 610.

32 citing documents.

Giglio v. Mirshahzadeh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Giglio v. Mirshahzadeh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
“[F]or an enforceable contract to exist there must be an offer, an acceptance, consideration, and sufficient specification of terms so that the obligations involved can be ascertained.” Regal Homes, ¶ 29 (App. 2007) (quoting Savoca Masonry Co. v. Homes & Son Const. Co., ).
Allegra G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Allegra G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Regal Homes, ¶ 52 (App. 2007) (explaining parties generally cannot raise issues for the first time on appeal).
Chalmers v. East Valley Fiduciary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Chalmers v. East Valley Fiduciary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Regal Homes, ¶ 52 (App. 2007) (explaining parties generally cannot raise issues for the first time on appeal); –01 (1994) (litigants cannot raise errors for the first time on appeal).
Bamford v. Toll Brothers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Bamford v. Toll Brothers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶10 An enforceable contract requires “’an offer, an acceptance, consideration, and sufficient specification of terms so that the obligations involved can be ascertained.’” Regal Homes, ¶ 29 (App. 2007) (quoting Savoca Masonry Co. v. Homes & Son Const. Co., (emphasis added in Regal Homes)).
O'Harra v. Jones, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
O'Harra v. Jones, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See, e.g., Lemons v. Showcase Motors, Inc., n.1, ¶ 17 (App. 2004) (“Legal issues and arguments must be presented to the trial court and generally cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.”) (citation omitted); see also Regal Homes, ¶ 52 (App. 2007) (the appellate court will not consider a question not raised in the superior court) (citation omitted).
State v. Miller 429 P.3d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Miller 429 P.3d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Regal Homes, ¶ 52 (App. 2007) (holding the appellate court will not consider a question not raised in the lower court (citing J.H.
Ribitzki v. American Family Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ribitzki v. American Family Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Deepwater v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Deepwater v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
The purported contract for insurance must be supported by “sufficient specification of terms so that the obligations involved can be ascertained.” Regal Homes, ¶ 29, (quoting Savoca Masonry Co. v. Homes & Son Const. Co., ).
Robertson v. La Paz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Robertson v. La Paz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Nucor Corp. v. Employers Insurance 296 P.3d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Nucor Corp. v. Employers Insurance 296 P.3d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Colorado Casualty Insurance v. Safety Control Co. 288 P.3d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Colorado Casualty Insurance v. Safety Control Co. 288 P.3d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
“[A]rising out of’ is a “broad, general, and comprehensive term[ ] effecting broad coverage.” Regal Homes, ¶ 15 , (citing Farmers Ins.
Murphy Farrell Development, LLLP v. Sourant 272 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Murphy Farrell Development, LLLP v. Sourant 272 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
See Regal Homes, ¶ 52 , (stating appellate court generally does not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal).
Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C. 269 P.3d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C. 269 P.3d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
3 Regal Homes, ¶ 52 , (stating appellate court generally does not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal).
Colorado Casualty Insurance v. Safety Control Co. 269 P.3d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Colorado Casualty Insurance v. Safety Control Co. 269 P.3d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
“[A]rising out of’ is a “broad, general, and comprehensive term[ ] effecting broad coverage.” Regal Homes, ¶ 15 , (citing Farmers Ins.
Leflet v. Redwood Fire & Casualty Insurance 247 P.3d 180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Leflet v. Redwood Fire & Casualty Insurance 247 P.3d 180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
” Regal Homes, ¶ 29 , (quoting Savoca Masonry Co. v. Homes & Son Constr.
County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co. 233 P.3d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co. 233 P.3d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Regal Homes, ¶ 52 , *607 (holding appellate court generally does not consider issues raised for first time on appeal).