Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Grubb & Ellis Management Services, Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., 138 P.3d 1210.
- Sierra Verde v. McLaren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Sierra Verde v. McLaren
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 21 (App. 2006)).
- Green Cross v. Mangisi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Green Cross v. Mangisi
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006).
- Carminucci v. Trimark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Carminucci v. Trimark
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006) (cleaned up)).
- Wedel v. Olympian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Wedel v. Olympian
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., LLC, ¶ 12 (App. 2006)).
- Brazee-Revocable Trust v. Phz-Msc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Brazee-Revocable Trust v. Phz-Msc
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006).
- Maarten Kalway v. Calabria Ranch Hoa LLC 506 P.3d 18 Ariz. 2022
-
Maarten Kalway v. Calabria Ranch Hoa LLC
506 P.3d 18
Ariz. 2022
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006), in special types of contracts, we do not enforce “unknown terms which are beyond the range of reasonable expectation,” Darner Motor Sales, (quoting Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 211 cmt.
- Brock v. Tellurian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Brock v. Tellurian
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Services, Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006) (“[W]hen parties bind themselves by a lawful contract the terms of which are clear and unambiguous, a court must give effect to the contract as written.”).
- Everson v. Tucci Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Everson v. Tucci
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006).
- Wollner v. Spanish Hills Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Wollner v. Spanish Hills
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006).
- Trap-Zap v. Facilitysource Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Trap-Zap v. Facilitysource
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006).
- Terrell v. Torres 438 P.3d 681 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Terrell v. Torres
438 P.3d 681
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006).
- Otto v. Otto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Otto v. Otto
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006).
- Roe v. Austin 433 P.3d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
-
Roe v. Austin
433 P.3d 569
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C. , , ¶ 12
- Dig Agave v. Pacific Financial Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Dig Agave v. Pacific Financial
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Services, Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006) (stating general principle that, “when parties bind themselves by a lawful contract the terms of which are clear and unambiguous, a court must give effect to the contract as written”).
- Calabrese v. Fortin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Calabrese v. Fortin
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006) (contract interpretation) (citation omitted).
- Stefanovich v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Stefanovich v. Anderson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 26 (App. 2006) (noting that contractual attorneys’ fees provision controls to the exclusion of a statute).
- Zelkind v. Del Webb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Zelkind v. Del Webb
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006).
- Great Western Bank v. LJC Development, LLC 362 P.3d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Great Western Bank v. LJC Development, LLC
362 P.3d 1037
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006)).
- holder/carter v. Arizona Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
holder/carter v. Arizona Board of Regents
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006)).
- Roberts v. Del Webb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Roberts v. Del Webb
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 26, (a contractual attorney’s fee provision controls to the exclusion of a statute); Keggi v. Northbrook Property & Cas.
- flash/schillinger v. Samons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
flash/schillinger v. Samons
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Serv., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12 (App. 2006).
- commerce/cra v. Zinke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
commerce/cra v. Zinke
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., (when contract provides for recovery of attorneys’ fees by successful party, court is required to award fees).
- Sullivan v. Homes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Sullivan v. Homes
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12
- Colorado Casualty Insurance v. Safety Control Co. 288 P.3d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
Colorado Casualty Insurance v. Safety Control Co.
288 P.3d 764
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Servs., Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C., ¶ 12
- Dessarollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo v. Kader Holdings Company Limited Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
- Dessarollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo v. Kader Holdings Company Limited Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012