DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Marriage of Leathers v. Leathers, 166 P.3d 929.

122 citing documents.

  • Vogue v. Maleknia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Vogue v. Maleknia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    See Schroeder, 161 Ariz. at 323, 778 P.2d at 1219; ¶ 12, (upholding spousal maintenance for an indefinite term in view of the wife’s ongoing health concerns and other § 25-319(B) factors).
  • Gazeley v. Larsen-Gazeley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Gazeley v. Larsen-Gazeley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Rozenman v. Rozenman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Rozenman v. Rozenman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    Section 25- 324(A) requires that we “examine both the financial resources and the reasonableness of the positions of each party,” ¶ 22, although we may award attorneys’ fees on the basis of either the parties’ financial disparity or reasonableness of their positions.
  • Mejia v. Mejia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Mejia v. Mejia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Nold v. Nold 304 P.3d 1093 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
  • Nold v. Nold 304 P.3d 1093 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
    ¶ 18 ¶ 18 , neither party addressed the continuation of a life insurance policy as a contested issue in the joint pretrial statement.
  • Downing v. Downing 265 P.3d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
  • Downing v. Downing 265 P.3d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
  • In Re Marriage of Gibbs 258 P.3d 221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
  • Gibbs v. Gibbs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
  • In Re Marriage of Gibbs 258 P.3d 221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
    “Section 25-324 requires us to examine both the financial resources and the reasonableness of the positions of each party.”
  • Gibbs v. Gibbs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
    “Section 25-324 requires us to examine both the financial resources and the reasonableness of the positions of each party.”
  • Ramsay v. WHEELER-RAMSAY 232 P.3d 1249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
  • Ramsay v. WHEELER-RAMSAY 232 P.3d 1249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
  • Maximov v. Maximov 205 P.3d 1146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • Maximov v. Maximov 205 P.3d 1146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
    ¶ 5 , (child support); ¶ 9 , (spousal maintenance).
  • Duwyenie v. Moran 207 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
  • Duwyenie v. Moran 207 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
    Before awarding fees under this section, we are required to “examine both the financial resources and the reasonableness of the positions of each party.”