Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Phelps Dodge Corp. v. El Paso Corp., 142 P.3d 708.

28 citing documents.

Nationstar v. Magnum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Nationstar v. Magnum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
"We are bound to affirm if the superior court was 'correct in its ruling for any reason.'" ¶ 4 (App. 2013) ( n. 7, ¶ 17 (App. 2006)).
Burns v. City of Tucson 432 P.3d 953 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Burns v. City of Tucson 432 P.3d 953 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
*955 Phelps Dodge Corp. v. El Paso Corp. , , ¶ 8
Razdan v. Razdan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Razdan v. Razdan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
L.L.C. v. Holm Wright Hyde & Hays P.L.C., n.2, ¶ 12 (App. 2014) ( n.7, ¶ 17 (App. 2006), n.3, ¶ 36 (App. 2007)).
Lowry v. Jp Morgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lowry v. Jp Morgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
at ¶ 9.1 We are bound to affirm if the superior court was “correct in its ruling for any reason.” n. 7, ¶ 17 (App. 2006).
Taylor v. Aps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Taylor v. Aps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
We can, however, affirm the judgment if the court was “correct in its ruling for any reason.” n.7, ¶ 17, n.7 (App. 2006) (citation omitted); n.3, ¶ 36, n.3 (App. 2007) (in examining the trial court’s ruling, we noted that we may affirm the trial court if it is correct for any reason supported by the record).
KCI Restaurant Management LLC v. Holm Wright Hyde & Hays PLC 341 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
KCI Restaurant Management LLC v. Holm Wright Hyde & Hays PLC 341 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
at 95, 259 P.2d at 261 (the party whose prior pleading is admitted as 2 We can, however, affirm the judgment if the court was “correct in its ruling for any reason.” n.7, ¶ 17, n.7 (App. 2006) ( ); n.3, ¶ 36, n.3 (App. 2007) (in examining the trial court’s ruling, we noted that we may affirm the trial court if it is correct
Midtown v. Farmers 334 P.3d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Midtown v. Farmers 334 P.3d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“We will sustain a dismissal only if the plaintiff[] could not be entitled to relief under any facts susceptible of proof under the claims stated.” -03, ¶ 8, -11 (App. 2006) (internal quotation marks omitted).
John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos 326 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos 326 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Peterson v. Newton 307 P.3d 1020 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Peterson v. Newton 307 P.3d 1020 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
We are bound to affirm if the superior court was “correct in its ruling for any reason.” , 404 n. 7, ¶ 17, , 712 n. 7 (App.2006).
Sullivan v. Pulte Home Corp. 290 P.3d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Sullivan v. Pulte Home Corp. 290 P.3d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
ANALYSIS ¶ 7 “We review de novo a trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.” N. Peak Constr., L.L.C. v. Architecture Plus, Ltd., ¶ 13 , *56 ( ¶ 8 , ).
North Peak Construction, LLC v. Architecture Plus, Ltd. 254 P.3d 404 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
North Peak Construction, LLC v. Architecture Plus, Ltd. 254 P.3d 404 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Canyon Ambulatory Surgery Center v. SCF Arizona 239 P.3d 733 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Canyon Ambulatory Surgery Center v. SCF Arizona 239 P.3d 733 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Mayer Unified School and Gadsen Elementary School v. Winkleman, Az State Land Dept... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Mayer Unified School and Gadsen Elementary School v. Winkleman, Az State Land Dept... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Cullen v. Koty-Leavitt Insurance Agency, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Cullen v. Koty-Leavitt Insurance Agency, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
P.3d 708 (App. 2006), for his proposed standard of review.