Cited by

¶ 23 (App. 2007) ("The burden rests on the spouse alleging inability to pay spousal maintenance to present evidence to support such inability.").

¶ 9 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 14 (App. 1998)).

n.5, ¶ 14 (App. 2007) (stating parties waive issues raised for the first time on appeal).

n.5, ¶ 14, n.5 (App. 2007).

See ARCAP 13(a)(6), (b)(1); n.5, ¶ 14 (App. 2007) (Appellate courts “will not consider argument[] posited without authority.”); ¶ 12 (App. 1999) (holding a pro se litigant to the same standard as an attorney).

App. P., applies to juvenile appeals); ¶ 14 n.5 (noting appellate courts generally “will not consider argument posited without authority”).

n.5, ¶ 14 (App. 2007) (stating issues raised for the first time on appeal are waived).

n.5, ¶ 14 (App. 2007) (appellate courts “will not consider arguments posited without authority”).

¶¶ 19-21 (App. 2007) (approving trial court’s consideration of the Maricopa County Superior Court Spousal Maintenance Guidelines where it “considered and applied the Guidelines consistent with the statutory factors” and did not use the Guidelines as “the sole basis for its determination of the amount or the dura

n.5 (App. 2007) (noting that appellate courts “will not consider arguments posited without authority.”).

n.5, ¶ 14, n.5 (App. 2007) (As a general rule, a party cannot argue on appeal legal issues not raised below.).

n.9, ¶ 101 (2004); n.5, ¶ 14 (App. 2007) (holding appellate courts “will not consider argument posited without authority”).

n.5, ¶ 14, n.5 (App. 2007) (appellate courts “will not consider argument posited without authority.”); ARCAP 13(a)(7) (requiring appellant to present significant arguments, set forth his or her position on the issues raised, and include citations to relevant authorities, statutes, and portions o

n.5, ¶ 4, n.5 (App. 2007) (As a general rule, a party cannot raise arguments on appeal that were not raised below.).

n.5, ¶ 14, n.5 (App. 2007) (stating we will not consider arguments on appeal not raised in the superior court).