Cited by

to original 1977 rule; Webb v. Omni Block, Inc., ¶ 14 (App. 2007) (“Such testimony is inadmissible because it provides no information to the trier of fact except what the verdict should read.”); Scop, 846 F.2d at against admitting just this kind of opinion evidence.

Webb v. Omni Block, Inc., ¶ 6 (App. 2007).

Webb v. Omni Block, Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2007); see Ariz. R. Evid.

“The test for whether a person is an expert is whether a jury can receive help on a particular subject from the witness.” Webb v. Omni Block, Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007) (citation omitted).

Webb v. Omni Block, Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2007).

704(a), although it “must still be helpful to the trier of fact and cannot be couched in legal conclusions that simply opine ‘how juries should decide cases,’” Webb v. Omni Block, Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2007); see also id.

9 BATTY v. AZ MEDICAL BRD Opinion of the Court Cf. Webb v. Omni Block, Inc., –54, ¶¶ 14, 17 (App. 2007) (explaining that expert opinions are often excluded as evidence when they tell the factfinder how to decide the case, or when couched as legal conclusions).

¶ 51 (2000); Webb v. Omni Block, Inc., ¶ 6 (App. 2007).

¶10 The ALJ correctly noted that Dr. KL is qualified to testify as an expert because he is licensed to practice in Arizona and that any concerns about his disciplinary history go to the weight of his testimony, not its admissibility.3 Webb v. Omni Block, Inc., -53, ¶ 10 (App. 2 The ALJ is better suited to consider factors such as “the tone of voice in which a witness’s statement is made, the hesitation or readiness with which his answers are given, the look of the witness, his carriage, his evid

See Webb v. Omni Block, Inc., –55, ¶¶ 17–20 (App. 2007) (holding that an expert’s opinion apportioning percentages of fault to the parties and non-parties “constituted inadmissible legal conclusions under Rule 704 because he thereby told the jury how to decide the case.”).

702; Webb v. Omni Block, Inc., ¶6 , (admissibility of expert testimony is within sound discretion of the superior court).

Webb v. Omni Block, Inc., ¶ 13

See Webb v. Omni Block, Inc., 9 (“An abuse of discretion exists when the court commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion.”); see also State v. Chapple, 135 Ariz. 281, 297 n.18, n.18 (1983) (appellate court not bound by t