Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Marriage of Boncoskey v. Boncoskey, 167 P.3d 705.

154 citing documents.

Barron v. Barron 443 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Barron v. Barron 443 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 13 (App. 2007) (-23 (App. 1984), ).
Young v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Young v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hutki v. Hutki 417 P.3d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hutki v. Hutki 417 P.3d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
The trial court abuses its discretion only where it "exceed[s] the bounds of reason," Toy v. Katz , , 83, , 1031 (App. 1997), or in exercising its discretion, commits an error of law, , 451, ¶ 13, , 708 (App. 2007).
Kern v. Kern Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Kern v. Kern Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“In apportioning community property between the parties at dissolution, the superior court has broad discretion to achieve an equitable division [.]” ¶ 13 (App. 8 KERN v. KERN Decision of the Court 2007).
Herrera v. Rivero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Herrera v. Rivero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Snook v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Snook v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 13 (App. 2007); see also A.R.S.
McCreary v. Silver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
McCreary v. Silver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jackman v. McCann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jackman v. McCann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Heroyan-Hamayak v. Hamayak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Heroyan-Hamayak v. Hamayak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
at ¶ 14 ( ¶ 13 (App. 2007)).
Sessions v. Sessions Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sessions v. Sessions Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
§ 12-2101.A.2; ¶ 12 (App. 2007) (recognizing the right to appeal from a qualified DRO as a special order after final judgment).
Weeks v. Weeks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Weeks v. Weeks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Thompson v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Thompson v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 13 (App. 2007) (citing Miller v. 6 -23 (App. 1984), ).
Kambourian v. Kambourian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Kambourian v. Kambourian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Stephens v. Stephens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Stephens v. Stephens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Bourke v. Bourke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Bourke v. Bourke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Olade v. Olade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Olade v. Olade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Beasley-Rodriguez v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Beasley-Rodriguez v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kent v. Carter-Kent 332 P.3d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kent v. Carter-Kent 332 P.3d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Three of the cases, -42, -09 (1981), involve pension issues and discuss the present cash value method vs. the reserved jurisdiction method of apportioning pensions.
Natale v. Natale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Natale v. Natale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Valento v. Valento 240 P.3d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Valento v. Valento 240 P.3d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Ramsay v. WHEELER-RAMSAY 232 P.3d 1249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Ramsay v. WHEELER-RAMSAY 232 P.3d 1249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Marriage of Flower 225 P.3d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Marriage of Inboden 225 P.3d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Marriage of Flower 225 P.3d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Marriage of Inboden 225 P.3d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Dowling v. Stapley 211 P.3d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Dowling v. Stapley 211 P.3d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
¶ 13 , (citation omitted).