Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass'n v. Kitchukov, 165 P.3d 173.

117 citing documents.

M2 Real Solutions v. Perry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
M2 Real Solutions v. Perry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
J. Ball Trust v. Phx Orchard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
J. Ball Trust v. Phx Orchard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 37 (App. 2007).
Moon Valley v. Tegrous Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Moon Valley v. Tegrous Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 37 (App. 2007).
Laufer v. Auditore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Laufer v. Auditore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Twin City v. Leija Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Twin City v. Leija Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶25 We review de novo the grant of a motion for summary judgment, ¶ 15 (App. 2007), viewing the facts and inferences in a light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was entered
Imh v. Aperion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Imh v. Aperion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 37 (App. 2007).
Kulpins v. Weaver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Kulpins v. Weaver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Moreover, the DRC’s approval of Weaver’s landscaping project, after the fact, was not an unreasonable exercise of its discretionary design-control powers, see Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 28 (App. 2007), which we may presume the superior court concluded as well.
McNally v. Sun Lakes Homeowners Ass'n 1, Inc. 382 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
McNally v. Sun Lakes Homeowners Ass'n 1, Inc. 382 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-02, ¶¶ 24-28 (App. 2007) (holding that members challenging discretionary decisions of a homeowners’ association are required to show the association’s actions were unreasonable).
Hawkins v. Blair Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Hawkins v. Blair Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“We view the facts and any inferences drawn from those facts in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.” Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 15 (App. 2007).
Comanche v. Pollard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comanche v. Pollard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
le because it contains no “temporal restrictions.” To successfully challenge a rule in the Declaration, Pollard bears the burden of proving Comanche Heights breached its duty “to ‘treat members fairly’ and the duty to ‘act reasonably in the exercise of its discretionary powers including rulemaking, enforcement, and design-control powers.’” Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 25 (App. 2007) (quoting Restatement (Third) of Property: Servitudes § 6.13 (2000)).
Watkins v. Arpaio 367 P.3d 72 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Watkins v. Arpaio 367 P.3d 72 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 15
Vista Verde v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Vista Verde v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 37 (App. 2007).
Madison v. Chicago Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Madison v. Chicago Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
DBT Yuma, 236 Ariz. at 374, ¶ 8 (citing Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 15 (App. 2007)).
Yang v. Az Chinese News Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Yang v. Az Chinese News Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Cemex Construction Materials South, LLC v. Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc. 349 P.3d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Cemex Construction Materials South, LLC v. Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc. 349 P.3d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
See Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, (deferring party’s request for attorney fees on appeal “to the trial court’s discretion pending resolution of the matter on the merits”).
Harris v. godaddy.com Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Harris v. godaddy.com Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 15
DBT Yuma, L.L.C. v. Yuma County Airport Authority 340 P.3d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
DBT Yuma, L.L.C. v. Yuma County Airport Authority 340 P.3d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mohr v. Murphy Elementary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mohr v. Murphy Elementary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 15
In Re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Weinstein v. Weinstein 326 P.3d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
In Re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Restatement § 219; Bogert & Bogert, supra, §§ 564, 948; Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, (Arizona courts follow Restatement in absence of governing law to contrary).
Weinstein v. Weinstein 326 P.3d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Restatement § 219; Bogert & Bogert, supra, §§ 564, 948; Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, , (Arizona courts follow Restatement in absence of governing law to contrary).
State v. Liberty Bail Bonds 314 P.3d 820 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Liberty Bail Bonds 314 P.3d 820 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
A. Miner Contracting, Inc. v. Toho-Tolani County Improvement District 311 P.3d 1062 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
A. Miner Contracting, Inc. v. Toho-Tolani County Improvement District 311 P.3d 1062 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
See Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 37 , (deferring party’s request for attorneys’ fees on appeal “to the trial court’s discretion pending resolution of the matter on the merits”).
Peterson v. Newton 307 P.3d 1020 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Peterson v. Newton 307 P.3d 1020 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
See Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov, ¶ 24
NICKERSON v. GREEN VALLEY RECREATION, INC. 265 P.3d 1108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
NICKERSON v. GREEN VALLEY RECREATION, INC. 265 P.3d 1108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Factual Background and Procedural History ¶2 On appeal from a summary judgment, “[w]e view the facts and any inferences drawn from those facts in the light most favorable to the part[ies] against whom judgment was entered.” Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov
NICKERSON v. GREEN VALLEY RECREATION, INC. 265 P.3d 1108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Factual Background and Procedural History ¶ 2 On appeal from a summary judgment, “[w]e view the facts and any inferences drawn from those facts in the light most favorable to the parties] against whom judgment was entered.” Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass’n v. Kitchukov
Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011