Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'n, 167 P.3d 1277.

70 citing documents.

Van Baalen v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, ¶ 32, Restatement (Second) of Torts (“Restatement”) §§ 821D, 821F, 822 (1979).
Cohen v. Cohen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Cohen v. Cohen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In the exercise of our discretion, we deny the first time on appeal); ¶ 38, (discussing discretionary award of fees under A.R.S.
Sneberger v. Hon. harris/cmre Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sneberger v. Hon. harris/cmre Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
The justice court also rejected CMRE’s argument that the fees should be reduced, finding it failed to specifically challenge the amount or reasonableness of the request, as required by Nolan v. Starlight Lines Homeowner’s Ass’n, ¶¶ 38-39
In Re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Weinstein v. Weinstein 326 P.3d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
In Re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Once the application has been submitted, “the burden shifts to the party opposing the fee award to demonstrate the impropriety or unreasonableness of the requested fees.” Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, see also State ex rel.
Weinstein v. Weinstein 326 P.3d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Once the application has been submitted, “the burden shifts to the party opposing the fee award to demonstrate the impropriety or unreasonableness of the requested fees.” Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, , see also State ex rel.
A. Miner Contracting, Inc. v. Toho-Tolani County Improvement District 311 P.3d 1062 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
A. Miner Contracting, Inc. v. Toho-Tolani County Improvement District 311 P.3d 1062 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
In our review *254 of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, “we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the [non-moving party], and determine de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in its application of the law.” Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, , (citation omitted).
Geller v. Lesk 285 P.3d 972 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Geller v. Lesk 285 P.3d 972 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, -91, ¶¶ 37-38 , -86 (App.2007) (application for fees must comply with requirements of Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc., , before burden shifts to party opposing fees to show amount requested is unreasonable); McDowell Mountain, 216 Ariz. at 270
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C. 281 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C. 281 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, ¶ 27
NICKERSON v. GREEN VALLEY RECREATION, INC. 265 P.3d 1108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
NICKERSON v. GREEN VALLEY RECREATION, INC. 265 P.3d 1108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
See § 12-341.01(A); see also Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, 216 Ariz 482, ¶¶ 34-39, -86 (App. 2007) (claims concerning servitudes arise out of contract for purposes of § 12-341.01).
NICKERSON v. GREEN VALLEY RECREATION, INC. 265 P.3d 1108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
See § 12-341.01(A); see also Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, ¶¶ 34-39 , -86 (App.2007) (claims concerning servitudes arise out of contract for purposes of § 12-341.01).
Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 219 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 219 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, ¶ 34 , Ramsey Air Meds., L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12