DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'n, 167 P.3d 1277.

72 citing documents.

  • Beck v. Hy-Tech Performance, Inc. 340 P.3d 433 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Athough “[a] party may breach the implied covenant [of good faith and fair dealing] even in the absence of a breach of an express provision of the contract by denying the other party the reasonably expected benefits of the agreement,” Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, ¶ 27 , the Becks could not have reasonably expected to recover possession of the Jaguar without paying the charges they agreed to pay, especially in light of their position that A.R.S.
  • Van Baalen v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Van Baalen v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    See Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, ¶ 32, Restatement (Second) of Torts (“Restatement”) §§ 821D, 821F, 822 (1979).
  • Cohen v. Cohen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Cohen v. Cohen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    In the exercise of our discretion, we deny the first time on appeal); ¶ 38, (discussing discretionary award of fees under A.R.S.
  • Sneberger v. Hon. harris/cmre Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Sneberger v. Hon. harris/cmre Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    The justice court also rejected CMRE’s argument that the fees should be reduced, finding it failed to specifically challenge the amount or reasonableness of the request, as required by Nolan v. Starlight Lines Homeowner’s Ass’n, ¶¶ 38-39
  • In Re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
  • Weinstein v. Weinstein 326 P.3d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
  • In Re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
    Once the application has been submitted, “the burden shifts to the party opposing the fee award to demonstrate the impropriety or unreasonableness of the requested fees.” Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, see also State ex rel.
  • Weinstein v. Weinstein 326 P.3d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
    Once the application has been submitted, “the burden shifts to the party opposing the fee award to demonstrate the impropriety or unreasonableness of the requested fees.” Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, , see also State ex rel.
  • A. Miner Contracting, Inc. v. Toho-Tolani County Improvement District 311 P.3d 1062 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
  • A. Miner Contracting, Inc. v. Toho-Tolani County Improvement District 311 P.3d 1062 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
    In our review *254 of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, “we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the [non-moving party], and determine de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in its application of the law.” Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, , (citation omitted).
  • Geller v. Lesk 285 P.3d 972 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
  • Geller v. Lesk 285 P.3d 972 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
    Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, -91, ¶¶ 37-38 , -86 (App.2007) (application for fees must comply with requirements of Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc., , before burden shifts to party opposing fees to show amount requested is unreasonable); McDowell Mountain, 216 Ariz. at 270
  • FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C. 281 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
  • FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C. 281 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
    Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, ¶ 27
  • NICKERSON v. GREEN VALLEY RECREATION, INC. 265 P.3d 1108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
  • NICKERSON v. GREEN VALLEY RECREATION, INC. 265 P.3d 1108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
    See § 12-341.01(A); see also Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, 216 Ariz 482, ¶¶ 34-39, -86 (App. 2007) (claims concerning servitudes arise out of contract for purposes of § 12-341.01).
  • NICKERSON v. GREEN VALLEY RECREATION, INC. 265 P.3d 1108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
    See § 12-341.01(A); see also Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, ¶¶ 34-39 , -86 (App.2007) (claims concerning servitudes arise out of contract for purposes of § 12-341.01).
  • Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 219 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 219 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
    Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, ¶ 34 , Ramsey Air Meds., L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc., ¶ 12