Cited by

Likewise, 71, ¶¶ 3, 13 (App. 2007), we reviewed whether spousal maintenance terminated upon the recipient’s remarriage, when the decree ordered “[s]aid term and amount of spousal maintenance is non-modifiable until October 21, 2008, except such shall end upon the death of [Wife]” but said nothing about remarriage.

Under section 25-327.B, spousal maintenance obligations terminate “upon the remarriage of the spouse receiving the payments unless the decree distinctly expresses, without the need of implication or inference, that the spousal maintenance will continue notwithstanding remarriage.” ¶ 10 (App. 2007).

¶ 7 (App. 2007) (reviewing rulings on summary judgment motions de novo).

¶ 7 (App. 2007); ¶ 7 (App. 2015) (“We review a parenting agreement de novo because it is incorporated into the dissolution decree and because it is ‘akin to a type of contractual agreement between the parties.’” (quoting Jordan, 221 Ariz. at 588, ¶ 15)).

¶ 22 (App. 2007) (vacating and remanding fee award where reversal on an issue had the potential to change the trial court's analysis regarding attorney fees).

shall be paid by the violating parent” and “may” be awarded if “the custodial parent prevails”); ¶ 22 (App. 2007) (vacating and remanding fee award where “[o]ur substantive ruling .

¶ 22 (App. 2007) (vacating and remanding fee award where "[o]ur substantive ruling .

He maintains that these statutes mandate 50-50 parenting time absent a finding of parental unfitness or endangerment.2 We review an order modifying parenting time for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 7 (App. 2003), but review questions of statutory interpretation de novo, ¶ 7 (App. 2007).

¶ 13 (App. 2007) (holding a maintenance obligation automatically terminates upon remarriage of the receiving spouse by operation of law pursuant to A.R.S.

We review an order modifying parenting time for an abuse of discretion, but questions of statutory interpretation are reviewed de novo, (applying de novo review “regarding the interpretation of statutes and decrees of dissolution”).

§ 25-327(B) (“Unless otherwise agreed in writing or expressly provided in the decree, the obligation to pay future maintenance is terminated on the death of either party or the remarriage of the party receiving maintenance.”); ¶ 23, 170 6The court denied Wife any distributions from HH toward her 2010 to 2011 income tax returns.

See, Palmer v. Palmer, 217 Ariz. 67, ¶ 7, -79 (App. 2007); (when court interprets ambiguous decree of other court, review of interpretation de novo).

¶ 7 , (applying a de novo review “regarding the interpretation of statutes and decrees of dissolution”).