Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Security Title Agency, Inc. v. Pope, 200 P.3d 977.

52 citing documents.

Soto v. Ten Bridges Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Soto v. Ten Bridges Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Title Agency, ¶ 83 (App. 2008) (citation omitted).
Weber v. Kory Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Weber v. Kory Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Title Agency, ¶ 54 (App. 2008).
McCombs v. Joyce C. Miller Trust Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
McCombs v. Joyce C. Miller Trust Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Title Agency, ¶ 51 (App. 2008) (citation omitted).
Kunasek v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Kunasek v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Title Agency, ¶ 44 (App. 2008).
Iglesia v. Brotherhood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Iglesia v. Brotherhood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Title Agency, ¶ 42 (App. 2008); see also Wells Fargo, 201 Ariz. at 488, ¶ 45 (citing with approval FDIC v. First Interstate Bank of Des Moines, N.A., 885 F.2d 423 (8th Cir. 1989) for the proposition a “bank can be held liable for aiding and abetting a customer who defrauded another bank if [the] bank has a ‘general awareness’
Powers Steel v. Vinton Steel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Powers Steel v. Vinton Steel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Title Agency, ¶ 64 (App. 2008).
Tarter v. Bendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Tarter v. Bendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Title Agency, ¶ 93 (App. 2008).
10k LLC v. Wvsv Holdings Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
10k LLC v. Wvsv Holdings Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Security Title Agency, ¶ 44 (App. 2008).
Vanoss v. BHP Copper Inc. 418 P.3d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Vanoss v. BHP Copper Inc. 418 P.3d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Title Agency, Inc. v. Pope , , ¶ 111, , 1002 (App. 2008).
Gillespie v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Gillespie v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Title Agency, ¶ 53 (App. 2008) (“Consistent with the fiduciary duty of loyalty, an employee may not, absent agreement to the contrary, statute or other authority, compete with his or her employer concerning the subject matter of the employment.”) (emphasis added).
Parks v. Abs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Parks v. Abs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Title Agency, ¶ 81 (App. 2008)); ("[A] damage award, punitive or otherwise, must be based on more than mere speculation or conjecture.").
Sobieski v. American Standard Insurance Co. 382 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sobieski v. American Standard Insurance Co. 382 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Title Agency, ¶ 81 (App. 2008)).
Helal v. Winski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Helal v. Winski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Title Agency, ¶ 81, see also Bradshaw v. State Farm Mut.
Eick v. Delta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Eick v. Delta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
arm suffered by the plaintiff and the punitive damages award; and (3) the difference between the punitive 5 EICK v. DELTA, et al. Decision of the Court damages awarded by the jury and the civil penalties authorized or imposed in comparable cases.” Security Title Agency, ¶ 94 (App. 2008) (quoting State Farm Mut.
Lee v. M & H Enterprises, Inc. 347 P.3d 1153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lee v. M & H Enterprises, Inc. 347 P.3d 1153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Arellano v. Primerica Life Insurance 332 P.3d 597 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Arellano v. Primerica Life Insurance 332 P.3d 597 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Title Agency, Inc. v. Pope (Pope), ¶ 51
Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. Noder 314 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. Noder 314 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Title Agency, , 492 ¶¶ 53, 55
James C. Sell v. Hon. gama/squire & Company 295 P.3d 421 Ariz. 2013
James C. Sell v. Hon. gama/squire & Company 295 P.3d 421 Ariz. 2013
Title Agency, ¶¶ 44–46, (breach of fiduciary duty); ¶¶ 49-50, 16 (App. 2007) (fraud).
Nardelli v. Metropolitan Group Property & Casualty Insurance 277 P.3d 789 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Nardelli v. Metropolitan Group Property & Casualty Insurance 277 P.3d 789 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Title Agency, ¶ 51 , (internal citation omitted).
SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. Partnership 265 P.3d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. Partnership 265 P.3d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Title Agency, ¶ 81 , (quotation omitted).
Roberts v. City of Phoenix 235 P.3d 265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Roberts v. City of Phoenix 235 P.3d 265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Title Agency, ¶ 111 , (stating that an appellate court will not disturb a trial court’s decision to award sanctions resulting from disclosure violations absent an abuse of discretion).
County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co. 233 P.3d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co. 233 P.3d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Taser International, Inc. v. Ward 231 P.3d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Taser International, Inc. v. Ward 231 P.3d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Title Agency, ¶ 53 , see also Restatement (Third) of Agency § 8.04 (2006) (“Throughout the duration of an agency relationship, an agent has a duty to refrain from competing with the principal----”).
SOLIMENO v. Yonan 227 P.3d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
SOLIMENO v. Yonan 227 P.3d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Title Agency, -05, ¶ 109-11 , -02 (App.2008) (finding “Rule 37(c)(1) further provides that ‘other appropriate sanctions’ may be imposed on the party, including reasonable expenses and attorney fees ‘caused by the failure’ to disclose.”).
Hudgins v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES, CO. 212 P.3d 810 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Hudgins v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES, CO. 212 P.3d 810 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Title Agency, -01, ¶ 93 , -98 (App.2008).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by